From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id UAA00712; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 20:27:48 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA01083 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 20:27:46 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from hotmail.com (bay22-dav17.bay22.hotmail.com [64.4.16.197]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5FIRiSH007840 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 20:27:45 +0200 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 11:27:44 -0700 Received: from 68.212.103.108 by bay22-dav17.bay22.hotmail.com with DAV; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 18:27:44 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [68.212.103.108] X-Originating-Email: [hellflame@hotmail.com] X-Sender: hellflame@hotmail.com From: "Hellflame" To: Cc: Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCaml compared as a scripting language Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 13:27:39 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0079_01C452DC.87AD49A0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Jun 2004 18:27:44.0424 (UTC) FILETIME=[7366C280:01C45306] X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 40CF3FA0.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 nuts:01 nuts:01 ocaml:01 lisp:01 lisp:01 exception:02 exception:02 arial:95 arial:95 scripting:05 tend:06 tend:06 comment:08 comment:08 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0079_01C452DC.87AD49A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I disbeleive that any language can be the one perfect language for all = tasks.=20 I think the Lisp camp would take exception to your comment. Most of the = Lisp hackers I know think it is the perfect language for all things and = is the best language out there. I tend to regard them as nuts and go = about my work though. HFX ------=_NextPart_000_0079_01C452DC.87AD49A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I disbeleive that any language can be the one = perfect=20 language for all
tasks.

I think the Lisp camp would take = exception to your=20 comment. Most of the Lisp hackers I know think it is the perfect = language=20 for all things and is the best language out there. I tend to = regard them=20 as nuts and go about my work though.

HFX

------=_NextPart_000_0079_01C452DC.87AD49A0-- ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners