From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 449B27F860 for ; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 12:01:44 +0100 (CET) Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch) identity=pra; client-ip=74.55.86.74; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch"; x-sender="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=74.55.86.74; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch"; x-sender="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@smtp.webfaction.com) identity=helo; client-ip=74.55.86.74; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch"; x-sender="postmaster@smtp.webfaction.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AsESABDVJlNKN1ZKnGdsb2JhbABZFoMrgj1WSr56gS4OAQEBAQEGDQkJFCiCJgEBAgIMF2YJAhoCJgICRxAQEYdxBAmUDZwXohcXgSmNDDoWglk1gRQEnnsXjxE X-IPAS-Result: AsESABDVJlNKN1ZKnGdsb2JhbABZFoMrgj1WSr56gS4OAQEBAQEGDQkJFCiCJgEBAgIMF2YJAhoCJgICRxAQEYdxBAmUDZwXohcXgSmNDDoWglk1gRQEnnsXjxE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,669,1389740400"; d="scan'208";a="63226334" Received: from mail6.webfaction.com (HELO smtp.webfaction.com) ([74.55.86.74]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 17 Mar 2014 12:01:43 +0100 Received: from [172.20.10.2] (33-237.197-178.cust.bluewin.ch [178.197.237.33]) by smtp.webfaction.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F851209A782 for ; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 11:01:40 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 12:01:37 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Daniel_B=C3=BCnzli?= To: caml-list@inria.fr Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <5326CFA2.909@etorok.net> References: <1732E7D3-C154-4305-90C8-0CC292FE08CF@gmail.com> <5326CFA2.909@etorok.net> X-Mailer: sparrow 1.6.4 (build 1178) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OpenGL and LWT Le lundi, 17 mars 2014 =C3=A0 11:34, T=C3=B6r=C3=B6k Edwin a =C3=A9crit : > Well there are a few that are slow, like swapping buffers which can wait = for vsync. Yes and you should make sure that the C bindings to these calls release the= ocaml runtime system lock during the call. Other slow calls are memory tra= nsfer calls (e.g. glBufferData). This book chapter [1] may be worth reading. Daniel [1] http://www.seas.upenn.edu/~pcozzi/OpenGLInsights/OpenGLInsights-Asynchr= onousBufferTransfers.pdf