From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <damien.doligez@inria.fr>
X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69C77BBAF
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 16:33:08 +0100 (CET)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,236,1288566000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="89098535"
Received: from macadam.inria.fr ([128.93.8.130])
  by mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 22 Nov 2010 16:33:08 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCaml + mingw-w64
From: Damien Doligez <damien.doligez@inria.fr>
In-Reply-To: <2017975850.988226.1290427453930.JavaMail.root@zmbs1.inria.fr>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 16:33:08 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <BE4C3D34-117E-4BFF-BBE7-C569FA0C8DF0@inria.fr>
References: <2017975850.988226.1290427453930.JavaMail.root@zmbs1.inria.fr>
To: OCaml mailing list <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 damien:01 damien:01 ocaml:01 byterun:01 doligez:01 doligez:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 caml:02 caml:02 match:02 christoph:04 inria:06 long:06 


On 2010-11-22, at 13:04, Christoph Cullmann wrote:

> In ocaml 3.12, in byterun/major_gc.h, there is:
> 
> intnat caml_major_collection_slice (long howmuch)
> 
> whereas in the .c file that is:
> 
> intnat caml_major_collection_slice (intnat howmuch)
> 
> As intnat is with mingw-w64 long long, this doesn't match.
> Should not the header use intnat, too?


You're right.  This will be fixed in 3.12.1.

-- Damien