From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 805567ED99 for ; Sat, 16 May 2015 00:28:45 +0200 (CEST) Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of pjfrey@sympatico.ca) identity=pra; client-ip=65.55.116.41; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="pjfrey@sympatico.ca"; x-sender="pjfrey@sympatico.ca"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of pjfrey@sympatico.ca designates 65.55.116.41 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=65.55.116.41; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="pjfrey@sympatico.ca"; x-sender="pjfrey@sympatico.ca"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@BLU004-OMC1S30.hotmail.com) identity=helo; client-ip=65.55.116.41; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="pjfrey@sympatico.ca"; x-sender="postmaster@BLU004-OMC1S30.hotmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BYAgDVcVZVlSl0N0FchAyzHAEGln6CUwKBMjsRAQEBAQEBAREBAQEBBw0JCR8whCMBAQQSJlELGC5XEwMFAQEeiAqnPQGwGgEBAQEGAQEBAR6GFoUkhHEbFoMBgRYBBItxiAqHT4NElUWCLRyBboMZAQEB X-IPAS-Result: A0BYAgDVcVZVlSl0N0FchAyzHAEGln6CUwKBMjsRAQEBAQEBAREBAQEBBw0JCR8whCMBAQQSJlELGC5XEwMFAQEeiAqnPQGwGgEBAQEGAQEBAR6GFoUkhHEbFoMBgRYBBItxiAqHT4NElUWCLRyBboMZAQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,437,1427752800"; d="scan'208";a="149453953" Received: from blu004-omc1s30.hotmail.com ([65.55.116.41]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 16 May 2015 00:28:44 +0200 Received: from BLU437-SMTP89 ([65.55.116.9]) by BLU004-OMC1S30.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.22751); Fri, 15 May 2015 15:28:43 -0700 X-TMN: [GIWgCqkB+4DeuwyWOHJCBrKV3x5tkZYQ] X-Originating-Email: [pjfrey@sympatico.ca] Message-ID: Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 18:28:36 -0400 From: peterfrey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: caml-list@inria.fr References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 May 2015 22:28:41.0853 (UTC) FILETIME=[7F42DAD0:01D08F5E] Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Repacking modules gives unexpected results On 15-05-12 05:47 PM, peterfrey wrote: > For quite a while now I have been using first class modules as a sort of replacement for objects. You are right, of course, I did not notice that the variables were not bound (not even after simplifying the code to almost nothing). 'Obvious' is not always obvious... Thanks a lot, I don't know how much longer I would have stared at this. > > Peter Frey > >