From: Kuba Ober <ober.14@osu.edu>
To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Optimizing symbolic processing code
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:46:46 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <C20197A3-90C8-4A4C-9CDC-26770D68615E@osu.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4970B398.5010100@inescporto.pt>
On Jan 16, 2009, at 11:19 AM, Hugo Ferreira wrote:
> Peter Ilberg wrote:
>> On Friday 16 January 2009 08:42:52 Hugo Ferreira wrote:
>>> I have implemented a simple Prolog like inference engine
>>> to be used in machine learning algorithms (ILP). My first
>>> basic test shows that inference is dismally slow (compared
>>> to a Prolog compiler).
>>> Consequently I am looking for information on optimizing the code.
>> For implementing a Prolog-like language, you might want to look at
>> this book on the Warren Abstract Machine:
>> http://web.archive.org/web/20030213072337/http://www.vanx.org/archive/wam/wam.html
>
> Ok, new of this document. But I think this demands too-much effort.
What you expect, basically, is for OCaml to magically translate your
likely cobbled-together, slowly performing interpreter into a bytecode
compiler and a VM.
That ain't happening, and it's not OCaml's fault. Try compiling your
code
in F# and see how fast it runs - I doubt you'll see an improvement of
more than an order of magnitude, unless you're really unlucky to hit
some OCaml's deficiencies. I doubt that SWI Prolog would be
substantially (as in more than an order of magnitude linear constant)
slower
if it were ported to OCaml.
Writing a well-performing Prolog system is not an overnight task, at
least
not without using some decent compiler/system building libraries, which
may not even exist.
Cheers, Kuba
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-16 21:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-16 8:42 Hugo Ferreira
2009-01-16 9:05 ` [Caml-list] " blue storm
2009-01-16 9:44 ` Hugo Ferreira
2009-01-16 13:41 ` Jon Harrop
2009-01-16 14:15 ` Hugo Ferreira
2009-01-16 16:14 ` Peter Ilberg
2009-01-16 16:19 ` Hugo Ferreira
2009-01-16 19:09 ` Andrej Bauer
2009-01-16 20:48 ` Andrej Bauer
2009-01-17 9:28 ` Hugo Ferreira
2009-01-17 11:39 ` Andrej Bauer
2009-01-17 15:47 ` Hugo Ferreira
2009-01-17 16:08 ` Hugo Ferreira
2009-01-16 21:46 ` Kuba Ober [this message]
2009-01-17 9:46 ` Hugo Ferreira
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=C20197A3-90C8-4A4C-9CDC-26770D68615E@osu.edu \
--to=ober.14@osu.edu \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).