From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60C977EE51
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Thu, 23 May 2013 10:41:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch) identity=pra;
  client-ip=74.55.86.74;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-sender="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch) identity=mailfrom;
  client-ip=74.55.86.74;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-sender="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@smtp.webfaction.com) identity=helo;
  client-ip=74.55.86.74;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch";
  x-sender="postmaster@smtp.webfaction.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: As4BAJvVnVFKN1ZKlWdsb2JhbABbhnO+boEgDgEBAQEHDQkJEiqCJAEFI1YQCxoCJgICRxAGG4gFBKh2kWqBJo1EMweCQTJhA51DE44y
X-IPAS-Result: As4BAJvVnVFKN1ZKlWdsb2JhbABbhnO+boEgDgEBAQEHDQkJEiqCJAEFI1YQCxoCJgICRxAGG4gFBKh2kWqBJo1EMweCQTJhA51DE44y
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,726,1363129200"; 
   d="scan'208";a="15392513"
Received: from mail6.webfaction.com (HELO smtp.webfaction.com) ([74.55.86.74])
  by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 23 May 2013 10:41:14 +0200
Received: from [192.168.1.126] (cpc3-cmbg9-0-0-cust324.5-4.cable.virginmedia.com [81.103.21.69])
	by smtp.webfaction.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8ABA210C2A5;
	Thu, 23 May 2013 08:41:11 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 09:41:09 +0100
From: =?utf-8?Q?Daniel_B=C3=BCnzli?= <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>
To: =?utf-8?Q?St=C3=A9phane_Glondu?= <steph@glondu.net>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Message-ID: <C6FD1926B72D449E8139A262070D7D33@erratique.ch>
In-Reply-To: <519DB8D2.5080102@glondu.net>
References: <20130522123427.GA1894@siouxsie> <519CC1C8.3060502@etorok.net>
 <20130522171907.GA6073@notk.org> <519DB8D2.5080102@glondu.net>
X-Mailer: sparrow 1.6.4 (build 1178)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Licenses - Confusion

Le jeudi, 23 mai 2013 =C3=A0 07:36, St=C3=A9phane Glondu a =C3=A9crit :
> I would say BSD-style licenses cater for the needs of organizations, and
> GPL-style ones cater for individuals.


Well as everyone seems to know and speak for the others, here's my take.=20=
=20

Regardless of copyleft -- which I'm certain could be expressed in a BSD-lik=
e concise way -- I would personally say that BSD-style licenses are for hum=
ans and GPL-style for lawyers.

If you need a lawyer to understand your freedom you are not free anymore. S=
top feeding the lawyers and the bureaucrats.

Best,

Daniel