From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id SAA11476; Thu, 18 Sep 2003 18:54:35 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA09834 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2003 18:54:34 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from inria.fr (macaque.inria.fr [128.93.8.158]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id h8IGsXj04801 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2003 18:54:33 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 18:54:33 +0200 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Segmentation fault at process initialization Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v552) From: Damien Doligez To: Ocaml Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <3F69B143.3080104@baretta.com> Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.552) X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 damien:01 damien:01 baretta:01 ocamlc:01 crashes:01 crashes:01 ocamldebug:01 library's:01 ocamldebug:01 segfault:01 alex:01 bytecode:01 doligez:01 doligez:01 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Thursday, September 18, 2003, at 03:21 PM, Alex Baretta wrote: > Let me point out that it is not ocamlc which crashes, but it is my > bytecode executable which crashes immediately, before any of my code > is executed--otherwise I'd get some diagnostic output, which I do not > get. You should use ocamldebug, it will tell you in which library's initialisation code your program crashes. With ocamldebug you can step back, even from a segfault. -- Damien ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners