From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 693C77F75C for ; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 10:39:59 +0200 (CEST) Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of stedolan@stedolan.net) identity=pra; client-ip=209.85.215.52; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="stedolan@stedolan.net"; x-sender="stedolan@stedolan.net"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of stedolan@stedolan.net) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.215.52; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="stedolan@stedolan.net"; x-sender="stedolan@stedolan.net"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail-la0-f52.google.com) identity=helo; client-ip=209.85.215.52; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="stedolan@stedolan.net"; x-sender="postmaster@mail-la0-f52.google.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlMBANheEVTRVdc0lGdsb2JhbABghDcEgni1PJhKCBYQAQEBAQcLCwkSLIQEAQEEEhFWEAEKCw0CAiYCAiEBEgEFARwGEyKIDAMRnghrizCOZQ1XhgsBFwqBIot0hS2BUwEEkkqIIoIQjnyESxgphRNrgUiBBwEBAQ X-IPAS-Result: AlMBANheEVTRVdc0lGdsb2JhbABghDcEgni1PJhKCBYQAQEBAQcLCwkSLIQEAQEEEhFWEAEKCw0CAiYCAiEBEgEFARwGEyKIDAMRnghrizCOZQ1XhgsBFwqBIot0hS2BUwEEkkqIIoIQjnyESxgphRNrgUiBBwEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,504,1406584800"; d="scan'208";a="94095936" Received: from mail-la0-f52.google.com ([209.85.215.52]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 11 Sep 2014 10:39:58 +0200 Received: by mail-la0-f52.google.com with SMTP id b8so11375426lan.11 for ; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 01:39:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=+Db9jtI5J6jXPqgeC+auBGA6YElPDLq9PTKq+2+QFv0=; b=beDH+8GsdtS+8jdn9pr7IFwUTcy97aomwHxKvMh59+TjvH9OveYCBqlJF37j7i7J/l eU6H/kBWcGGQz+lxoCMtjRqv7Tel+S1oZY53QxDbhNK3pWClcbcsQsPl2fkILC0ha9To pWf272H7mUh0M/sNxP3GZCU9I0ZGwOMUCgu6ewTtsy1YgBo/BWzr95gv33HfeNxBpWJY uYMesIKAzAQJS154BtasnlqCJhU8DYPd7mEIb3ScswKXWHuWAkGSFtGZ1cNYmlFjoU58 sSyWjkUWZ/IuVWptAQewSJ6pks8wa2TDsGrRas84QwyKQLSdu4CfEvHMozPbFvr0JuPw epsw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnfBsn25sfGviqaxyathhbPGvVtBOr6Mu/y+jb9k8Ms6SvKrWWZdgo2zvgMQYhYaRl62XQ3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.27.200 with SMTP id v8mr28869310lag.53.1410424798317; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 01:39:58 -0700 (PDT) Sender: stedolan@stedolan.net Received: by 10.114.11.65 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 01:39:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [131.111.184.8] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 09:39:58 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: mQ1rO2hv7O-raF9qq07RQXwHWwQ Message-ID: From: Stephen Dolan To: Yotam Barnoy Cc: Ocaml Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Multicore runtime On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 11:42 PM, Yotam Barnoy wrote: > Maybe I misunderstood something. Does each domain only have a minor private > heap (ie. copying gc) or do they each also have a major private heap/older > generation (mark and sweep)? If they have an older generation, then a thread > could potentially have a lot of data there, no? Only a private minor heap. The major heap is the shared heap.