From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 378977F75C for ; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 17:06:46 +0200 (CEST) Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of stedolan@stedolan.net) identity=pra; client-ip=209.85.217.170; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="stedolan@stedolan.net"; x-sender="stedolan@stedolan.net"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of stedolan@stedolan.net) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.217.170; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="stedolan@stedolan.net"; x-sender="stedolan@stedolan.net"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail-lb0-f170.google.com) identity=helo; client-ip=209.85.217.170; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="stedolan@stedolan.net"; x-sender="postmaster@mail-lb0-f170.google.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AucBADMWD1TRVdmqlGdsb2JhbABZhDcEgni1PZpECBYQAQEBAQcLCwkSLIQEAQEEEhFWEAEKCw0CAiYCAiEBEgEFARwGEyKIDAMRBJpZa4swjn4NV4YGARcKgSKLdIUtgVMFjyyDFoghghCOc4RJGCmFE2uBSIEHAQEB X-IPAS-Result: AucBADMWD1TRVdmqlGdsb2JhbABZhDcEgni1PZpECBYQAQEBAQcLCwkSLIQEAQEEEhFWEAEKCw0CAiYCAiEBEgEFARwGEyKIDAMRBJpZa4swjn4NV4YGARcKgSKLdIUtgVMFjyyDFoghghCOc4RJGCmFE2uBSIEHAQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,491,1406584800"; d="scan'208";a="93789012" Received: from mail-lb0-f170.google.com ([209.85.217.170]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 09 Sep 2014 17:06:45 +0200 Received: by mail-lb0-f170.google.com with SMTP id u10so2486488lbd.1 for ; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 08:06:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=k+gbCex9w64ef8pqlbQAdw/7zyRn22XLEt+dppEImlA=; b=hTQNuqAog6GL+WuVCdTzpnJdNlM1tlgF7YCBJc+Hy+kpVuEJG/N8NnJXSnX9AW1xTA bRqvV6C4xVhFXi+w3WeDqjTp+92K6VRLtTTwOn4hGLaNWqFR36+Ax3U8wXTBLLtHD95U IL8oyP9USI3ITjK/O7POzdPNlI3EX48pYdPxVULn5QlcacGjvLifgMyMTL3jf3aXFtsz TUVBb/AFsG69uY193ZD0sZ3noQAJzGxwPM0/kSvfnio5lT1PCnJzlHiosoJQ2PR+T1AK LhHjw15pQN1fAbM7afDQPPn48IPntFCYOpAyj8Uaz27yuZv4StqsBtnJNi36rGfzAREb Mt/g== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmM7UDtBziA8lBY68QMtSWP9EtY9HGoIbfd32Ktr2LG+j7B5XiG5eVvp7dmS+/1cv4QYiJB MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.1.6 with SMTP id 6mr36509359lai.22.1410275204899; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 08:06:44 -0700 (PDT) Sender: stedolan@stedolan.net Received: by 10.114.11.65 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 08:06:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [94.116.30.138] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 16:06:44 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: vF44S1dpV_ONgT5SfzeqxwDhPqY Message-ID: From: Stephen Dolan To: Yotam Barnoy Cc: Ocaml Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Multicore runtime On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 3:24 AM, Yotam Barnoy wrote: > I have another question about the runtime. I believe it was mentioned in the > talk that there would be work-stealing between the domains. But how can we > have any work-stealing when the fibers are integrated deeply inside the > domains' local heaps? With great care. Stephen