caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jacques Garrigue <garrigue@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp>
To: Norman Hardy <norm@cap-lore.com>
Cc: Mailing List OCaml <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Equality between abstract type definitions
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 14:28:42 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+p7B-wK6VzJQqNpGvRzCJXAYbHZX5NyeyvSifTeGP05N+iWtQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53FD8CDF-0FB3-463A-B2DA-077488CEDC71@cap-lore.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 763 bytes --]

Both explicit polymorphic annotations and the polymorphic syntax of locally
abstract types are extensions.
http://caml.inria.fr/pub/docs/manual-ocaml/extn.html
See subsections 7.12 and 7.13.

Jacques Garrigue
2013/10/26 10:09 "Norman Hardy" <norm@cap-lore.com>:

>
> On 2013 Oct 25, at 13:44 , Jacques Le Normand <rathereasy@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> I'm surprised noone has pointed out the new type annotation syntax:
>
> let id : type s. s -> s = fun x -> x
>
>
> I like that syntax, I think.
> I suppose that "id : type s. s -> s = fun x -> x" is a let-binding
> and that "id : type s. s -> s" is a pattern,
> but I cannot get the syntax at
> http://caml.inria.fr/pub/docs/manual-ocaml/patterns.html
> to produce "id : type s. s -> s”.
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1672 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-26  5:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-24 22:57 Peter Frey
2013-10-24 23:23 ` Jacques Garrigue
2013-10-25  6:44   ` Andreas Rossberg
2013-10-25  8:29     ` Roberto Di Cosmo
2013-10-25  9:59       ` Ivan Gotovchits
2013-10-25 11:09         ` Gabriel Scherer
2013-10-25 14:24           ` Andreas Rossberg
2013-10-25 20:32             ` Yaron Minsky
2013-10-25 20:44               ` Jacques Le Normand
2013-10-26  1:08                 ` Norman Hardy
2013-10-26  5:28                   ` Jacques Garrigue [this message]
2013-10-27 12:16               ` Andreas Rossberg
2013-10-27 12:56                 ` Yaron Minsky
2013-10-27 14:28                   ` Gabriel Scherer
2013-10-27 14:43                     ` Yaron Minsky
2013-10-27 15:25                       ` Gabriel Scherer
2013-10-27 15:41                         ` Yaron Minsky
2013-10-25 12:35         ` Roberto Di Cosmo
2013-10-25 12:45           ` Jonathan Protzenko
2013-10-25 13:20             ` Roberto Di Cosmo
2013-10-25 14:03       ` Andreas Rossberg
2013-10-26  9:07         ` oleg
2013-10-26 14:11           ` Didier Remy
2013-10-26 17:32         ` Didier Remy
2013-10-27 12:07           ` Andreas Rossberg
2013-10-27 14:10             ` Roberto Di Cosmo
2013-10-28  3:30     ` Jacques Garrigue

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CA+p7B-wK6VzJQqNpGvRzCJXAYbHZX5NyeyvSifTeGP05N+iWtQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=garrigue@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    --cc=norm@cap-lore.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).