From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <philippe.wang.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 493AF7ED1A
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Mon, 21 May 2012 16:18:53 +0200 (CEST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AmIKAJNNuk/RVdi2kGdsb2JhbABEpRmOYQgiAQEBAQkJDQcUBCOCFQEBAQMBEgIsATgBAwwBBQULAzgiEgEFARwGEyKHXgMGBaBvCQOPFIUNJw2JTAEFDIp5hU0DjRWIBo4VPYFTgjY
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,631,1330902000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="144510173"
Received: from mail-qc0-f182.google.com ([209.85.216.182])
  by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-MD5; 21 May 2012 16:18:52 +0200
Received: by qcsg15 with SMTP id g15so5016558qcs.27
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Mon, 21 May 2012 07:18:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=RTbmQ2bFNo9zSYNKFV0tg6eO0YqCuK4rNuJu9rBaQfA=;
        b=ifo4Ou8qfTY2MBDNi4KWnCzSZYWPAiWtzZrIcKLQ8njtnrdZTq865C7QNPmeYY46Mj
         HetBjpWQ0k3KO2pElVvnRMwVSnzONsY2JPY5xiAa0e/VB7SXZR/6DeABLKbA7lUMvaZP
         kcKmzd4LCRvofqE2tDg5R2ZU3WPTi6A4Bz3PbNMr0zzocdVnB4uof0S2g+WaztTruJ1Z
         9nxRRlaRm01lECbk7Hu6bvOXQTJuwJFLroxdGp6EEyTEv/Qpr914RDLUXWqHpvxZnETN
         JobU0vSBolUM5Kvn+/oCMWlTwpTW06GgDHeueG+uDxgY7uJilx0REr58byNCcMBM4Hm4
         D83w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.60.169.146 with SMTP id ae18mr18974624oec.36.1337609931292;
 Mon, 21 May 2012 07:18:51 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: philippe.wang.lists@gmail.com
Received: by 10.182.60.193 with HTTP; Mon, 21 May 2012 07:18:50 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1337607107.25112.77.camel@thinkpad>
References: <20120521142336.79901oeoxunjuoc8.lealanko@webmail.helsinki.fi>
	<1337601452.19263.0@samsung>
	<CAAFfW_qcFEFgtFAcdscsG9wAowzqdxh3u+RVuBFjyA=MtHmqNw@mail.gmail.com>
	<1337607107.25112.77.camel@thinkpad>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 16:18:50 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: UKcFVPNNTnq1GR4KhZkGq9uWkug
Message-ID: <CAAFfW_p1gfrDsnWfnP5gj7-5Qa4YSgsvB4Nx7Uq_RDVCOq1m5w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Philippe Wang <mail@philippewang.info>
To: Gerd Stolpmann <info@gerd-stolpmann.de>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Channels not closed on gc?

On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Gerd Stolpmann <info@gerd-stolpmann.de> wrote:

>> Wouldn't it be a good idea to provide both ways?
>> i.e., one that collects automatically, in addition to the current one
>> that doesn't.
>
> You can easily do this yourself:
>
> Gc.finalise close_in ch

Certainly, but I meant on a high-level way, without the need to
explicitly use OCaml's internal API, for the sake of "non ocaml
hackers".  :)

--
Philippe Wang