From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 535B67EE6B for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 06:30:46 +0100 (CET) Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of sirinath@sakrio.com) identity=pra; client-ip=74.220.193.158; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="sirinath@sakrio.com"; x-sender="sirinath@sakrio.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Neutral (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of sirinath@sakrio.com does not assert whether or not 74.220.193.158 is permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=74.220.193.158; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="sirinath@sakrio.com"; x-sender="sirinath@sakrio.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@alt-proxy2.mail.unifiedlayer.com) identity=helo; client-ip=74.220.193.158; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="sirinath@sakrio.com"; x-sender="postmaster@alt-proxy2.mail.unifiedlayer.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Au4BAMW9nlJK3MGenGdsb2JhbABahBK6CR4OAQEBAQEGFgk1B4IcUAEBOB0BB10TBSMLHIdtBaUcixCEUgEFjDoRBpM4iUOOVIZFJ4lShQY X-IPAS-Result: Au4BAMW9nlJK3MGenGdsb2JhbABahBK6CR4OAQEBAQEGFgk1B4IcUAEBOB0BB10TBSMLHIdtBaUcixCEUgEFjDoRBpM4iUOOVIZFJ4lShQY X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,822,1378850400"; d="scan'208";a="39196562" Received: from alt-proxy2.mail.unifiedlayer.com ([74.220.193.158]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with SMTP; 04 Dec 2013 06:30:44 +0100 Received: (qmail 28088 invoked by uid 0); 4 Dec 2013 05:30:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box780.bluehost.com) (66.147.244.80) by oproxy19.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 4 Dec 2013 05:30:40 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sakrio.com; s=default; h=Content-Type:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version; bh=yNpsONOOec8/MBd5pzPzwFi1KsNC6VxoIa1Hx9jXd2A=; b=ycZJuOrk2gSD9FJqDtZpzIP6Z4EAtJqKmJ422gEjEDC9vYlJ+euPgOzuak3CcdexJfI39AmfgFi+nRTcMG5ArMDV3/FluIgUQoAw52yn/2aMqm9wr2rSxBdtgiRtSS3V; Received: from [209.85.160.49] (port=37202 helo=mail-pb0-f49.google.com) by box780.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vo52m-000144-Hf for caml-list@inria.fr; Tue, 03 Dec 2013 22:30:40 -0700 Received: by mail-pb0-f49.google.com with SMTP id jt11so22390679pbb.8 for ; Tue, 03 Dec 2013 21:30:39 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=yNpsONOOec8/MBd5pzPzwFi1KsNC6VxoIa1Hx9jXd2A=; b=bCf69zEZtEW5wu1MhSMq6deykgMEaNHz1e1yy53aDe/L6WvSKN3rhpVREJbfmzeMLG 4boeHWEj+zJue/r6auYN6irozDoSN+v4pfepBmwRPEHM0np37dnWqjgFRYIDrdRYS1XR mgqvPQZ6Pxowfxprow3CAQS9p9wFQETKlUCMprArgIYF7+CwQYSt9l+ZX4+IuSQbeLl5 klmv+gFIli/S1jWcZR/b8ku7hDzMzlE9HsR8Czs1bjaU/6vgVABUDb1YBT5W8OKWSNC+ U8sKiuDv8ujeJDJmAq9Uofafho9YbkC3SVLcf7il046mySHv7zErCaERPZHv8TlGMGv7 VpPQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.197.165 with SMTP id iv5mr15394393pbc.150.1386135039608; Tue, 03 Dec 2013 21:30:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.36.236 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 21:30:39 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 11:00:39 +0530 Message-ID: From: Suminda Dharmasena To: "caml-list@inria.fr" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8ff1cce6a5954d04ecaeb611 X-Identified-User: {2382:box780.bluehost.com:sakrioco:sakrio.com} {sentby:smtp auth 209.85.160.49 authed with sirinath@sakrio.com} Subject: [Caml-list] Licensing Camel and related Projects Under a Permissive License --e89a8ff1cce6a5954d04ecaeb611 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, Many of the major tools and implementation (tools within the implementation also) have different licensing like QPL, GPL, LGPL. I am wondering if you community can discuss about perhaps using more permissive licensing and come to a consensus on licensing guideline. (Ultimately is it up to the IP holder how they license.) But some discussion of re licensing would be beneficial to bring the many projects under a permissive license. Suminda --e89a8ff1cce6a5954d04ecaeb611 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,

Many of the major tools and impleme= ntation (tools within the implementation also) have different licensing lik= e QPL, GPL, LGPL.

I am wondering if you community = can discuss about perhaps using more permissive licensing and come to a con= sensus on licensing guideline. (Ultimately is it up to the IP holder how th= ey license.) But some discussion of re licensing would be beneficial to bri= ng the many projects under a permissive license.

Suminda
--e89a8ff1cce6a5954d04ecaeb611--