Re: [Caml-list] Anonymous sum types in functors

["Raphaël Proust" <raphlalou@gmail.com>]

On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Kristopher Micinski
<krismicinski@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> The "reason" for wanting to avoid that in this instance is the specific application - the sets are actually bit masks and there are about 50 of them (using a code generator, unsurprisingly). Given that the ocamldoc output is already going to be interesting, I was trying to avoid having 100 modules if possible :o)
>
> This honestly sounds like something that you should be able to avoid
> in OCamlDoc.  It seems sensible you should be able to mark things as
> "don't generate documentation for these", but I havent' seen such.

From: http://caml.inria.fr/pub/docs/manual-ocaml/manual029.html#toc120

The special comment (**/**) tells OCamldoc to discard elements placed
after this comment, up to the end of the current class, class type,
module or module type, or up to the next stop comment.


Cheers,
-- 
______________
Raphaël Proust