From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <yallop@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B8A37EEF8
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 01:11:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  yallop@gmail.com) identity=pra; client-ip=209.85.217.182;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="yallop@gmail.com";
  x-sender="yallop@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of
  yallop@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.182 as permitted
  sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.217.182;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="yallop@gmail.com";
  x-sender="yallop@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible;
  x-record-type="v=spf1"
Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@mail-lb0-f182.google.com) identity=helo;
  client-ip=209.85.217.182;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="yallop@gmail.com";
  x-sender="postmaster@mail-lb0-f182.google.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AKAQDn26pVm7bZVdFbg2daDwaDHbo3hX8CgRoHTAEBAQEBARIBAQEBAQYLCwkhLoQjAQEBAwESER0BGx0BAwELBgULDQICJgICIQEBEQEFARwGEyKHdgEDCgioFoEsPjGLP4FsgnmKSAoZJw1XhFcBAQEBAQUBAQEBARcBBQ6BFIoqgk2COQeCaIFDBYw4iBqEb4VKgWiRX4VeEiOBFReCGR+BVD0xgksBAQE
X-IPAS-Result: A0AKAQDn26pVm7bZVdFbg2daDwaDHbo3hX8CgRoHTAEBAQEBARIBAQEBAQYLCwkhLoQjAQEBAwESER0BGx0BAwELBgULDQICJgICIQEBEQEFARwGEyKHdgEDCgioFoEsPjGLP4FsgnmKSAoZJw1XhFcBAQEBAQUBAQEBARcBBQ6BFIoqgk2COQeCaIFDBYw4iBqEb4VKgWiRX4VeEiOBFReCGR+BVD0xgksBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,500,1432591200"; 
   d="scan'208";a="140486368"
Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com ([209.85.217.182])
  by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 19 Jul 2015 01:11:04 +0200
Received: by lbbyj8 with SMTP id yj8so77737618lbb.0
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 16:11:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        bh=lkW5vSP3HP3JNMa5W30sgfP1pJ3xJWjrJZr2sqPThKs=;
        b=pJyC/Zlp1p8yrLnjoN7aZzw2Lrf1bwM9sSiQ7dpZI+MFFVUE6zfBPuXN4vR8gzQkfp
         6KI3yvW25WkM7VtkSET3Ib1MlNcHAr8uocT4Z0A+IXVRfNpgI7/e97lwWlLW+iGv7VeX
         aZdcJfIt2V8DcMht5mB0Ntk/yiP9fqcjNuDt4CAVp0+OHbd0pPs21jyRGpLQ11gWE35g
         jMHhREUb+o9Ziwo6giU1BNiICh3mdD8Jb8I351rVM6KQtJU+cAhV7UnWNdNH7+11gu+Q
         HBCC7jOrbsQA3Y1Ljzb4zDxOvgkSe4ltrSbpm/kf8ZK3PGnRrOXMsUp3m43OatdxIrin
         RRxw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.126.42 with SMTP id mv10mr21311749lbb.58.1437261063437;
 Sat, 18 Jul 2015 16:11:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.25.199.10 with HTTP; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 16:11:03 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAK7rcp_cQ1NY7O6tQQKJeRak19G0vtNc4bVQy-3gJxkiJ=bcBQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAK7rcp-mivmm-VQhfzSSe_yVyYjMShjjQaYQuATAFr9LQ3x83Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPFanBH5mBQErwUBXtXsUSzZC3j1o3NnUR0g6PGqkckD7AtnLQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAK7rcp91-rB20+s3UA0ndj3+O_hDrfBFgeXrZiWAHN4t0zBY2Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAK7rcp-yDjiGzU5oGPkv5TbB-Kb3RiRra9es4TcKobKaMmazKQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAK7rcp_cQ1NY7O6tQQKJeRak19G0vtNc4bVQy-3gJxkiJ=bcBQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 00:11:03 +0100
Message-ID: <CAAxsn=EReT0rZ00e5G9K=N0cFdc5G_4d3xfKK1Yi6hHZuNV6Lw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jeremy Yallop <yallop@gmail.com>
To: Kenneth Adam Miller <kennethadammiller@gmail.com>
Cc: caml users <caml-list@inria.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCamlJava opam packages troubles

On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 9:36 PM, Kenneth Adam Miller
<kennethadammiller@gmail.com> wrote:
> There are duplicate ocamlfind specific opam packages:
>
> opam search ocamlfind
> ...
> ocamlfind-ocj             --  A library manager for OCaml
> ocj-ocamlfind             --  A library manager for OCaml

It appears that ocj-ocamlfind is the one to use, since it corresponds
to a much more recent version than ocamlfind-ocj:

   $ opam show ocamlfind-ocj | grep version
                version: 1.4.0
      installed-version:
      available-version: 1.4.0
   $ opam show ocj-ocamlfind | grep version
                version: 1.5.5
      installed-version:
      available-version: 1.5.5

> I can't continue development using ocamljava until I can install that
> package. I don't know how to continue hunting this error. Basically, the
> library that I'm developing uses -package bytes in the command line, so I
> presume that base.bytes is the opam package that it's talking about.

If you have ocj-ocamlfind installed then I don't think you need
base-bytes as well, since ocj-ocamlfind automatically installs the
bytes package.  (There are two notions of "package" here:
ocamlfind/findlib packages, such as "bytes", which are specified with
the "-package" flag to ocamlfind, and OPAM packages, such as
"base-bytes".  There's not always a one-to-one correspondence between
the two.)

You can check whether the bytes findlib package is available by
running the following command:

   ocamlfind query bytes

Here's how you might build and run a simple program using OCaml-Java,
ocj-ocamlfind and the bytes package:

   $ cat test_bytes.ml
   let () =
     let name = Sys.argv.(0) in
     Printf.printf "%s (length %d)\n" name (Bytes.length name)
   $ ocamlfind java -o test_bytes.jar -package bytes test_bytes.ml
   $ java -jar ./test_bytes.jar
   /tmp/test_bytes.jar (length 19)

Kind regards,

Jeremy.