caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Ridge <tom.j.ridge+caml@googlemail.com>
To: Xavier Leroy <Xavier.Leroy@inria.fr>
Cc: caml-list <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Thread behaviour
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 16:12:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABooLwOstn7yCXwGr_6n62tKN5ZPDoLbr-7=pSRMdmUQptuYYA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <524941CC.1080906@inria.fr>

On 30 September 2013 10:18, Xavier Leroy <Xavier.Leroy@inria.fr> wrote:
> On 2013-09-27 12:10, Tom Ridge wrote:
>> I have a little program which creates a thread, and then sits in a loop:
>> [...]
>> When I run the program I get the output:
>>
>> 1
>> 2
>>
>> and the program then sits in the loop.
>
> On my machine (OCaml 4.01.0, Ubuntu 12.04 LTS), I sometimes see what
> you see, and sometimes I see the expected output:
>
> 1
> 2
> 3
> hello
> 4
>
> It all depends on the whim of the OS scheduler.  OCaml has no control
> over it.  And you shoudn't expect any kind of fairness from the OS
> scheduler, esp. Linux's, which gladly jettisons any pretense of
> fairness in the hope of getting better throughput.
>

Ah! You are saying that the problem (maybe) lies with the Linux scheduler.
This had never occurred to me. Probably because I assumed the Linux
phrase "completely fair scheduler" meant something (although
admittedly, I never tried to find out what).

Thanks

  reply	other threads:[~2013-09-30 15:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-27 10:10 Tom Ridge
2013-09-27 10:22 ` Simon Cruanes
2013-09-27 10:27 ` Romain Bardou
2013-09-27 10:51   ` Benedikt Grundmann
2013-09-28 19:09     ` Tom Ridge
2013-09-29  7:54       ` Tom Ridge
2013-09-29 12:37         ` Yaron Minsky
2013-09-29 16:25           ` Tom Ridge
2013-09-29 16:46             ` Chet Murthy
2013-09-29 17:18               ` Tom Ridge
2013-09-29 17:47                 ` Chet Murthy
2013-09-30  8:24                   ` Romain Bardou
2013-10-07 14:57                     ` Goswin von Brederlow
2013-09-30  8:16       ` Romain Bardou
2013-10-01  3:32         ` Ivan Gotovchits
2013-10-07 14:49       ` Goswin von Brederlow
2013-09-30  9:18 ` Xavier Leroy
2013-09-30 15:12   ` Tom Ridge [this message]
2013-09-30 16:01     ` Török Edwin
2013-09-30 16:56     ` Gabriel Kerneis
2013-09-30 18:18       ` Alain Frisch
2013-10-01  5:01   ` Pierre Chambart
2013-10-01  7:21     ` Gabriel Kerneis
2013-10-02 10:37     ` Wojciech Meyer
2013-10-02 11:52       ` Francois Berenger
2013-10-02 11:58         ` Wojciech Meyer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CABooLwOstn7yCXwGr_6n62tKN5ZPDoLbr-7=pSRMdmUQptuYYA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=tom.j.ridge+caml@googlemail.com \
    --cc=Xavier.Leroy@inria.fr \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).