From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90EF67EEB4 for ; Sat, 2 Feb 2013 21:22:54 +0100 (CET) Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of chamaeleon@gmail.com) identity=pra; client-ip=209.85.210.51; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="chamaeleon@gmail.com"; x-sender="chamaeleon@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of chamaeleon@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.51 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.210.51; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="chamaeleon@gmail.com"; x-sender="chamaeleon@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail-da0-f51.google.com) identity=helo; client-ip=209.85.210.51; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="chamaeleon@gmail.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mail-da0-f51.google.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjYCAKV0DVHRVdIzjWdsb2JhbABFhkimA5JjCBYOAQEBAQkJCwkSBiOCHwEBBSMdARsSCwEDCAQGBQsGAwECAQICCR0CAiEBAREBBQEKCggGExKHbAEDDwyjTotlT4J7hAkKGScDClmIdwEFDIEXinqEIoETA4hmi2GBWIEdiiKDMRYphDw X-IPAS-Result: AjYCAKV0DVHRVdIzjWdsb2JhbABFhkimA5JjCBYOAQEBAQkJCwkSBiOCHwEBBSMdARsSCwEDCAQGBQsGAwECAQICCR0CAiEBAREBBQEKCggGExKHbAEDDwyjTotlT4J7hAkKGScDClmIdwEFDIEXinqEIoETA4hmi2GBWIEdiiKDMRYphDw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,591,1355094000"; d="scan'208";a="866683" Received: from mail-da0-f51.google.com ([209.85.210.51]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 02 Feb 2013 21:19:35 +0100 Received: by mail-da0-f51.google.com with SMTP id i30so2158666dad.10 for ; Sat, 02 Feb 2013 12:22:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Z68OazRhA6f2quGBWGJhSNKpTpcbEF4QN4mmsPkXbH4=; b=Yd1JtqrLcpM9WYcgzaE2J2YRA5KijuPTWZRNtAekh31YAfaL3M2xiwaMerUVZDs2nE WyyKuX8AxQAX8jpNa2lFH64tGBt8t4KzPvwu9BA349X49aHaBGuVM2GR1w1UqjV67KAb WsjQG2U54JA4NOo2ZoG1G2Bx1AzH1rnJhUxi8weXvzXwgw+xTqI4v2//IZl46vZrUaOr 8jHJnXEEty757wXBlvuKGWPqxpU+SgfXH2pZvtZqswVkQUBcb0jYQ8kdhRAO2HvvkZIg r2EHZ+YyLXUODqYepsDr6D63xpfjSn87EAUOBAoWbqCF+ZOtqCliOJ/BnqKjnAyVVB8h JJ9g== X-Received: by 10.68.242.134 with SMTP id wq6mr42621150pbc.146.1359836571308; Sat, 02 Feb 2013 12:22:51 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.66.87.8 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Feb 2013 12:22:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <510D7014.7000001@vb.fdn.fr> References: <510D7014.7000001@vb.fdn.fr> From: Lars Nilsson Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 15:22:11 -0500 Message-ID: To: "Vincent B." Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Re: [Caml-list] [ANN] ocurl forked and 0.5.4 released Reply vs Reply All miss by me. Sorry, Vincent. Lars Nilsson On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Vincent B. wrote: > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: [Caml-list] [ANN] ocurl forked and 0.5.4 released > Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 14:29:58 -0500 > From: Lars Nilsson > To: Vincent B. > > On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 5:27 AM, Vincent B. wrote: >> >> >> On 31/01/2013 10:21, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >>> >>> >>> Can you tell us why you need to fork ocurl? Why not continue the origin= al >>> project? >>> >>> And if you must fork then please change the name so the two don't get >>> confused. >>> >>> MfG >>> Goswin >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> This fork started as I (on behalf of the OPAM team) asked for a fork of >> ocurl to include in OPAM since the original ocurl has not been updated f= or a >> long time, and is not compiling anymore out of the box, at least on rece= nt >> versions of OCaml. Moreover as ygrek said, his version accumulates lots = of >> bugfixes meant to be integrated into the official branch for a long time >> already, that could not make it because the original author did not answ= er >> at all. >> >> The need of a fork arises from what is mentionned before, mostly the >> original author being unreachable and the changes accumulating too much = to >> be kept as separate patches. >> >> As for changing the name, I would personally not do it since it is a >> rightful continuation of the ocurl project (and is backward compatible).= I=E2=80=99m >> suggesting to wait for the original ocurl author to reappear to see if we >> can finally merge the changes. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Vincent > > > I have no problem with this fork, or the name remaining the same. I > have not used OCaml in a long time and people more active than me > probably are better at taking care of it at this point. > > Lars Nilsson > > > > > -- > Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives: > https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs