From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <david.mentre@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5401F7EE49
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 09:53:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  david.mentre@gmail.com) identity=pra;
  client-ip=209.85.215.41;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="david.mentre@gmail.com";
  x-sender="david.mentre@gmail.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of
  david.mentre@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.41 as permitted
  sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.215.41;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="david.mentre@gmail.com";
  x-sender="david.mentre@gmail.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1"
Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@mail-la0-f41.google.com) identity=helo;
  client-ip=209.85.215.41;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="david.mentre@gmail.com";
  x-sender="postmaster@mail-la0-f41.google.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgUCADi4NlLRVdcplGdsb2JhbABahBGCYwG/IQgWDgEBAQEHCwsJEiqCJgEFQAE5AwwBBQULOx8CARIBBQEcBgESh3EDD5xtj1iEECcNiSABBQyMeYEbhXgDjkyHRoFpjEGDShgpgWGCbTqBNQ
X-IPAS-Result: AgUCADi4NlLRVdcplGdsb2JhbABahBGCYwG/IQgWDgEBAQEHCwsJEiqCJgEFQAE5AwwBBQULOx8CARIBBQEcBgESh3EDD5xtj1iEECcNiSABBQyMeYEbhXgDjkyHRoFpjEGDShgpgWGCbTqBNQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.90,913,1371074400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="26964697"
Received: from mail-la0-f41.google.com ([209.85.215.41])
  by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 16 Sep 2013 09:53:00 +0200
Received: by mail-la0-f41.google.com with SMTP id ec20so2911731lab.0
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 00:52:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
         :subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=hKhQ358l9sXEd9vqYzEYIEN+3opq4GCeM5ZDqe2n+6s=;
        b=00KV8HrQ8f1pti0BE1Zji1v0rhIVJmt9nbWvAzaF84AWey6MRZ/W7hD+Q8vHTabJRu
         cmEoNT/kM/cjZ7nH4LtFZ7Lwq1vanOEJxRLkhvYKQbN80XKCT8rZpbyaPiRmXTjU8UNn
         jUCUsDWZHP3EnKmB+Yxap0rdy+bnXYSjT/l9Pzx1wAjaDkdo3wTmCoZhRq9NIY6gCQY7
         3zarjta/gGLyMuRTV/ITb8uxIMiSWBDGzhJWywN6Jbp2kiF2NR2B6KTo/SrehzUBmJlz
         zHtxerqiedj9v2QSCzAmLNoGrjJTN/7YLePei38UaQhnkVHeDlGfpPFZt1bMDTtdReaT
         Uvww==
X-Received: by 10.112.198.39 with SMTP id iz7mr5256044lbc.24.1379317977654;
 Mon, 16 Sep 2013 00:52:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: david.mentre@gmail.com
Received: by 10.112.45.108 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 00:52:27 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20130915103027.GA21344@jrm>
References: <20130915103027.GA21344@jrm>
From: David MENTRE <dmentre@linux-france.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 09:52:27 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: qGHi3tvQwDcJXCBMKyDWmVWR4cQ
Message-ID: <CAC3Lx=YDaeGAuFqxZw=U1aASiQ+hwuFP=OmexbCk4t+apr2vvA@mail.gmail.com>
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9_Romildo_Malaquias?= <j.romildo@gmail.com>, 
	caml users <caml-list@inria.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Accessing record fields

Hello,

2013/9/15 Jos=E9 Romildo Malaquias <j.romildo@gmail.com>:
> Which one would be preferred in this case: f or g?

Use the one which is the more readable and maintainable in the long
term, especially for micro-optimization like this.

Best regard,
david