From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55E047EDE3 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 16:30:55 +0200 (CEST) Received-SPF: None (mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of david.mentre@gmail.com) identity=pra; client-ip=209.85.216.182; receiver=mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="david.mentre@gmail.com"; x-sender="david.mentre@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of david.mentre@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.182 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.216.182; receiver=mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="david.mentre@gmail.com"; x-sender="david.mentre@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail-qc0-f182.google.com) identity=helo; client-ip=209.85.216.182; receiver=mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="david.mentre@gmail.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mail-qc0-f182.google.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjYCAFv7h1DRVdi2k2dsb2JhbABEwWgIIwEBAQEJCQsJFAQjgh8BAQQSAiwBOAEDDAEFBQs7HwMSAQUBHAYTIodQAw+cBWAJA48ehSQnDYlOAQUMkkIDjSuISI5YFimBWII7 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,640,1344204000"; d="scan'208";a="178750569" Received: from mail-qc0-f182.google.com ([209.85.216.182]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 24 Oct 2012 16:30:37 +0200 Received: by mail-qc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id k19so8217qcs.27 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 07:30:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=y5awEFW/c1lAaUw3Zgo3BfTifRQ25Kgxb7zOESKvZDM=; b=Npj/T4/OEj121WkdBym0vYr4FQ09yVJEgRueBW+lj48NVQ0lRCOv1KPVHOrrcxgyuZ YtB4Wz4vrMMNBFzQuAqJnwsqvdnBS9BBzYq8y1xVLJ5bbJs3yfjNzcEmB90qLdDBXNyY xGH250jpXDcBHyyay5KrxLt1r+XIbfXtvtb+60eRo9H0DzY7ELl2EOwvwcktjkH2X49G 3BaM6/2dc4eJIXrtVSwYUnSNvsuAm8j55VUo9sRY0kNIt+JK9SFHQkxOqtCB+Va9Xls9 srD66bS6G0G6rIZQo2aaJHzj9+LORk85ZNm8DeyQjpnr1gpGRtr5wUGVUkxa56Ma2HPD Jaow== Received: by 10.224.117.20 with SMTP id o20mr4640789qaq.12.1351089036097; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 07:30:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: david.mentre@gmail.com Received: by 10.49.120.225 with HTTP; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 07:30:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <46CAD019-77F8-4134-9A96-94A593AB7BC0@first.in-berlin.de> References: <5087C409.3030203@coherentgraphics.co.uk> <5087E16C.8020503@coherentgraphics.co.uk> <46CAD019-77F8-4134-9A96-94A593AB7BC0@first.in-berlin.de> From: David MENTRE Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 16:30:05 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: dWwE9Jhxu1AtLtBeQgPqXwVCqQ8 Message-ID: To: Oliver Bandel Cc: caml users Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Behaviour of an OCaml program: any possible GC improvement? Hello Oliver and John, 2012/10/24 Oliver Bandel : >>> Are you sure >>> you've used the -p both for compiling all source files and also when linking >>> them into the final executable? >> >> I just checked. Yes, I'm using -p for both compilation and linking. > > And did you touched all your ml files after activating these switches? > Not, that you recompiled only some of the files... and the others > were compiled before adding -p switch? Yes but... OK, found it! I was compiling .mli files with ocamlc instead of ocamlopt -p. But, after recompiling everything from scratch and redoing my tests (taking care of erasing old gmon.out file), I have the same result (with calling caml_call_gc). :-( Best regards, d.