From: David MENTRE <dmentre@linux-france.org>
To: Esther Baruk <esther.baruk@gmail.com>
Cc: oliver <oliver@first.in-berlin.de>,
"caml-list@inria.fr users" <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] French study on security and functional languages
Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 17:18:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAC3Lx=a9zCzBvD0eHRg8SS8D49+dH4hweBsfNwuOKBWf_ETYMA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFzMiE19Nk1bU_5Z_CdRNhBiV3W67Ohxjba2eGnMsLXS1uuhcA@mail.gmail.com>
Hello,
2013/5/24 Esther Baruk <esther.baruk@gmail.com>:
> These documents do not even mention the -ppx option and thus the project was
> done without comparing the two approaches...
I just glimpsed through the documents but some of them seem quite old
(2011) and they are referencing OCaml 3.12.0.
Regarding the recommendations, they are always debatable. Hopefully
they have a rationale that permit to understand why the document
author proposed such a recommendation.
Nonetheless I find interesting and refreshing[1] the fact that ANSSI
is at least seriously considering OCaml for writing security related
programs.
Regards,
david
[1] Pun intended regarding the current French weather.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-24 15:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-24 7:02 David MENTRE
2013-05-24 7:55 ` Francois Berenger
2013-05-24 12:35 ` rixed
2013-05-24 14:43 ` oliver
2013-05-24 15:15 ` rixed
2013-05-27 1:18 ` Francois Berenger
2013-05-24 14:35 ` oliver
2013-05-24 14:59 ` Esther Baruk
2013-05-24 15:05 ` oliver
2013-05-24 15:18 ` David MENTRE [this message]
2013-05-24 15:36 ` Esther Baruk
2013-05-24 23:13 ` oliver
2013-05-26 14:14 ` Marek Kubica
2013-05-24 17:44 ` Pierre-Etienne Meunier
2013-05-27 8:55 ` Fabrice Le Fessant
2013-05-24 14:47 ` oliver
2013-05-24 15:02 ` Johan Grande
2013-05-24 12:41 ` Olivier Levillain
2013-05-24 12:46 ` Anil Madhavapeddy
2013-05-25 8:53 ` Olivier Levillain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAC3Lx=a9zCzBvD0eHRg8SS8D49+dH4hweBsfNwuOKBWf_ETYMA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=dmentre@linux-france.org \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=esther.baruk@gmail.com \
--cc=oliver@first.in-berlin.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).