rpc_parallel might also be of use.

On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 6:04 AM, Francois Berenger <
francois.berenger@inria.fr> wrote:

> On 03/09/2016 11:23 AM, Mohamed Iguernlala wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Functory may be suitable as well
>> (http://opam.ocaml.org/packages/functory/functory.0.5/)
>>
>
> and maybe lwt-parallel by Ivan Gotovchits or
> procord by Cryptosense; all available libraries in opam.
>
>
> --
>> Mohamed Iguernlala.
>> Senior R&D Engineer, OCamlPro SAS
>> Research Associate, VALS team, LRI
>>
>> Le 09/03/2016 11:07, Francois Berenger a écrit :
>>
>>> On 03/09/2016 10:50 AM, 刘坚 wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>>           I’m recently writing a formal verification tool in OCaml, and
>>>> it works really well, but I’m considering writing a concurrent version.
>>>> However, until now, there seems to be no way to write programs that take
>>>> advantage of multi-cores.
>>>>
>>>
>>> To accelerate something, probably you want paralellism, not concurrency.
>>>
>>> I recomend parmap, but there are some other libraries out there
>>> too for that purpose (in opam: forkwork and probably others I don't
>>> know).
>>>
>>> But be careful that too fine granularity calculations don't
>>> parallelize well.
>>> For example, if you are analyzing source code, maybe analyzing
>>> distinct files in parallel would be a coarse enough granularity.
>>>
>>> > So, I’m wondering when will OCaml support
>>>
>>>> multi-core programming? Or else, do I have other choices by using some
>>>> external extensions of OCaml instead of the standard library?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Jian
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
> --
> Regards,
> Francois.
> "When in doubt, use more types"
>
> --
> Caml-list mailing list.  Subscription management and archives:
> https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
>