From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8461B7EE51 for ; Thu, 2 May 2013 23:16:36 +0200 (CEST) Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of yminsky@gmail.com) identity=pra; client-ip=74.125.82.42; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="yminsky@gmail.com"; x-sender="yminsky@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of yminsky@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.42 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=74.125.82.42; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="yminsky@gmail.com"; x-sender="yminsky@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail-wg0-f42.google.com) identity=helo; client-ip=74.125.82.42; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="yminsky@gmail.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mail-wg0-f42.google.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AkoCAO/WglFKfVIqjWdsb2JhbABShi4BvS4IFg4BAQEBBwsLCRIGJIIxIBUBGx4DEhBdAQwBBAEFAQMBOYdxAQECD6FrgnaMOgmCdYRgChkEChkNWIceAQUMjzeDPQOXK4cWiDcWKUaECSA X-IPAS-Result: AkoCAO/WglFKfVIqjWdsb2JhbABShi4BvS4IFg4BAQEBBwsLCRIGJIIxIBUBGx4DEhBdAQwBBAEFAQMBOYdxAQECD6FrgnaMOgmCdYRgChkEChkNWIceAQUMjzeDPQOXK4cWiDcWKUaECSA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,599,1363129200"; d="scan'208";a="13043096" Received: from mail-wg0-f42.google.com ([74.125.82.42]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 02 May 2013 23:16:36 +0200 Received: by mail-wg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id j13so137908wgh.3 for ; Thu, 02 May 2013 14:16:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:reply-to:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=N8x6QlXHZvYk8xjEfOnab2/PCyljbWEaZZ2OQFxYumo=; b=mnuX3UshNlDpaJ9Lt5P09N4bZUgosvsvWQeL0hZf2RNL3aKgwiMCimo4D7cnGU0cE8 dSz6hDhMaCbNgqrMSMNQ/Hh/ukb5alFdTk+IwH6fODP82YfQrrR+sZIs/gr/ex1pMatQ QjpMfarjwNHhfMkKSzKNpQhPf6Omc6A6PATV5RC070CfahBIfbz+7HIsELViFVvDYkdw cNQUm+vlOJOYmED57IzXCAZ1Rm/1u/b9UjH4p2n24rb5bg0FIn8rzXkARYqYA03YQvl4 qWD5G+esn3o8o4wCxOURwa/2x1YqmMQfdMcKFKYedssRGemU4IaUxiBCOwjv/LtX+K4v t2gQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.78.204 with SMTP id d12mr10344268wjx.42.1367529395580; Thu, 02 May 2013 14:16:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.178.69 with HTTP; Thu, 2 May 2013 14:16:35 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: yminsky@gmail.com Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 17:16:35 -0400 Message-ID: From: Yaron Minsky To: caml-list@inria.fr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: [Caml-list] -principal Can anyone describe the pluses and minuses of turning on -principal? Is it considered to be good practice for codebases that are compatible with it? Can it change behavior of currently working code? y