Re: [Caml-list] Re: Jump-to-definition and type-aware completion for Caml (was : Argot 1.0 release)

[Yaron Minsky <yminsky@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1063 bytes --]

On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 9:21 AM, Daniel Bünzli
<daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>wrote:

> Thanks for all the links.
>
> > Beware that all those projects tend to be built as patches to the
> > ocaml distribution, which means difficult deployment (which means few
> > users, which means few maintenance, which means bitrot).
>
> That's the problem. I tend not to rely too much beyond what is
> provided by the standard distribution.
>
> > You may also have a look at the various attempts at integrating OCaml
> with Java IDEs (Oca'IDE, Ocaml Development Tools, etc.).
>
> Well I'm really not fond of IDEs. I usually find them very invasive
> and bureaucratic and I'm not productive in them. So far emacs is the
> only system that works really well for me (it's also an "IDE" that
> works everywhere, even in the terminal). But I have to admit that some
> IDEs provide features that I would like to have in the emacs modes I
> use.
>

OCamlspotter as well as the tools that OCamlPro is working on should work
fine from within vim and emacs.

y

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1453 bytes --]