From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2CD77FCEF for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 21:14:36 +0200 (CEST) Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of emmanuel.surleau@gmail.com) identity=pra; client-ip=209.85.218.45; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="emmanuel.surleau@gmail.com"; x-sender="emmanuel.surleau@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of emmanuel.surleau@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.45 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.218.45; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="emmanuel.surleau@gmail.com"; x-sender="emmanuel.surleau@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail-oi0-f45.google.com) identity=helo; client-ip=209.85.218.45; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="emmanuel.surleau@gmail.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mail-oi0-f45.google.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ByAQCc/TNVmy3aVdFchDoFgxLEcoYNAoEaBzsRAQEBAQEBAREBAQEBAQYLCwkULoQhAQEEAQIPER0BGx0BAwwGBQsNAgImAgIiAREBBQEcBhMbB4d0AQMRqA4+MYs5gWuCdokVChknDVSEZwEBAQcCARkBBQ6BE4oWhFEzB4JogUUFm0yBH5A1ggQSI4EMCYJZgT48MYJEAQEB X-IPAS-Result: A0ByAQCc/TNVmy3aVdFchDoFgxLEcoYNAoEaBzsRAQEBAQEBAREBAQEBAQYLCwkULoQhAQEEAQIPER0BGx0BAwwGBQsNAgImAgIiAREBBQEcBhMbB4d0AQMRqA4+MYs5gWuCdokVChknDVSEZwEBAQcCARkBBQ6BE4oWhFEzB4JogUUFm0yBH5A1ggQSI4EMCYJZgT48MYJEAQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,604,1422918000"; d="scan'208";a="112055010" Received: from mail-oi0-f45.google.com ([209.85.218.45]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 19 Apr 2015 21:14:35 +0200 Received: by oiko83 with SMTP id o83so109315476oik.1 for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 12:14:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/Mtpv4jsRrHxIHJsEO8ArlJlyytREWtedev/0JlMIGY=; b=FNLRipD8IfpGayQ1XrP2xFgNceXl2ElOTV9PbLitUY7z+gZjtnSz0Jg5Bv9z78ruoP TrkPIK+eo5wuimpKnbpWC3G+lvnO4dTt086ji3BUgAGAFdlPfaFMsHIVvaoF92PumTwg MWMM8nPAubltA7dK62T1FmbRbt1BkNENUMeu34/5SChwiOcGtjT//z/uPBRjv0bCuPgC GQsGsO2kv2vlUfNEVWojoWTw80wyIpBs4YnR9bKQlbX31/0Av3Oxwh1AsU4Zn88HWqkZ Z3gQUdf1Y0c2OwAXkuvvShvt3dy3SO6ShhshXXy/855W1xn/v6oeMrIiqhRkUNOlIzOI KQ6A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.117.5 with SMTP id ka5mr11361681oeb.69.1429470874448; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 12:14:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.72.146 with HTTP; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 12:14:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1C4B8D903341432CB5D1CAF025C3814F@erratique.ch> References: <877ftfoudd.fsf@gmail.com> <20150419064722.GA25301@notk.org> <67E83AEE021C4CF3826AA7A3575C5635@erratique.ch> <1C4B8D903341432CB5D1CAF025C3814F@erratique.ch> Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 21:14:34 +0200 Message-ID: From: Emmanuel Surleau To: =?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_B=C3=BCnzli?= Cc: David Allsopp , Adrien Nader , Malcolm Matalka , "caml-list@inria.fr" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Suggested way to determine platform specific capabilities in build system? On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Daniel B=C3=BCnzli wrote: > Le dimanche, 19 avril 2015 =C3=A0 12:13, David Allsopp a =C3=A9crit : >> > I know this is the way autocrap likes to work; it may seem smart but I >> > think that's completely retarded. >> >> Um, while your arguments often veer a little towards ad hominem attacks,= the word "retarded" used in this context is extremely offensive, even if t= hat is not what you intended (making allowance that while your English is e= xtremely good, it is not your first language). > > I don't see any ad hominem attack here I'm criticizing tools and approach= es =E2=80=94 if Adrien think there is one, I'm sorry and tell him he should= not take it as such. > > Regarding the sentence you mention I'll rephrase it just for you (or any = other person I may have offended): > > =E2=9D=80 I know this is the way autoheaven likes to work, however it see= ms that while I can appreciate that this technique has his merits I do have= slight concerns with it. =E2=9D=80 While I agree with David about the form, I agree with you about the content. Using version numbers brings its own pains, but all in all it is considerably more reliable than the other solutions. Cheers, Emm