Thank you all for the answers. Finally i managed to make my whole project
portable. I didn't manage to successfully create it since the beginning
because the my makefile was still using ocamlc for certain files, and I
didn't notice this before.

Regards,
Andreea

On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 11:42 PM, David MENTRE <dmentre@linux-france.org>wrote:

> Hello,
>
> 2011/10/31 David Allsopp <dra-news@metastack.com>:
> > Compile it with ocamlopt instead of ocamlc - Chapter 11 of the manual
> (which it's a little surprising you hadn't got to, if you've been looking
> for a few days)...
> http://caml.inria.fr/pub/docs/manual-ocaml/manual025.html
> >
> > "This chapter describes the OCaml high-performance native-code compiler
> ocamlopt, which compiles Caml source files to native code object files and
> link these object files to produce standalone executables."
>
> Depending on the level of independence one might want on the
> underlying system, ocamlopt alone might not me enough, as C libraries
> are still dynamically linked. Option "-ccopt -static" is needed to
> produce real statically linked binaries. Some parts of the OCaml
> runtime may not work when statically linked, YMMV.
>
> Example:
>
> $ cat hello.ml
> open Format
>
> let _ = printf "Hello@\n"
>
>
> $ ocamlopt hello.ml
>
> $ ./a.out
> Hello
>
> $ ldd ./a.out
>        linux-vdso.so.1 =>  (0x00007fff127e7000)
>        libm.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6 (0x00007faf7ca80000)
>        libdl.so.2 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdl.so.2 (0x00007faf7c87c000)
>        libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x00007faf7c4e7000)
>        /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007faf7cd2a000)
>
> $ ocamlopt -ccopt -static hello.ml
>
> $ ./a.out
> Hello
>
> $ ldd ./a.out
>        not a dynamic executable
>
> $ file ./a.out
> ./a.out: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (GNU/Linux),
> statically linked, for GNU/Linux 2.6.15, not stripped
>
>
> Best regards,
> david
>