From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D48DE7F30A for ; Fri, 8 Mar 2013 20:05:28 +0100 (CET) Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of monnier.florent@gmail.com) identity=pra; client-ip=209.85.219.48; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="monnier.florent@gmail.com"; x-sender="monnier.florent@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of monnier.florent@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.48 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.219.48; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="monnier.florent@gmail.com"; x-sender="monnier.florent@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail-oa0-f48.google.com) identity=helo; client-ip=209.85.219.48; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="monnier.florent@gmail.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mail-oa0-f48.google.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AuYBAFg1OlHRVdswkGdsb2JhbABDxE6BUwgWDgEBAQESFBQogiwBAQEDAQECCTQBGxILAQMBCwYFCw0uIgEFDAEFARyIGQEDCQadU4wygnuEQAoZJw1ZiHwBBQyOTTMHFoMqA5QVgj6BHo1yFimELg X-IPAS-Result: AuYBAFg1OlHRVdswkGdsb2JhbABDxE6BUwgWDgEBAQESFBQogiwBAQEDAQECCTQBGxILAQMBCwYFCw0uIgEFDAEFARyIGQEDCQadU4wygnuEQAoZJw1ZiHwBBQyOTTMHFoMqA5QVgj6BHo1yFimELg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,809,1355094000"; d="scan'208";a="4715105" Received: from mail-oa0-f48.google.com ([209.85.219.48]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 08 Mar 2013 20:05:27 +0100 Received: by mail-oa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id j1so2378682oag.7 for ; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 11:05:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fHntw8+E5weTy/+qRKcymqdAqJFqnxCDyjHs5L5QlHY=; b=M+ZU1I/lvaoEIfdOzvbdRheLsOEg8TMRcmual/K2cLLPcl2VPktXhHugP+OD1ncSwN XaTNUwD0hnlxgEXfVUvL2v4OI/WERcfXoEU4Xkl6i426yExqoRUvjB7Rt0XIv/8gTzqZ xoEF7OBVASjuLWiIlHJlSHVj4JLU0UtpE5tIYvFzM6dahzo96T65aQFzR3qcJw3nREKN l8j684fVlCXNQ8r2DIBSYRa8wsiYP1hT3oSTJO57wVkivxcqIcih9gzuYyxtFlYMlZZV pDHr+gGnWG46MuztuxfqSw7yzYShZpcHCjoZYN65MID8DlH52HkMo6NCVwIrj8MlQonq +T6A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.22.34 with SMTP id a2mr2676873oef.97.1362769525407; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 11:05:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.30.200 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Mar 2013 11:05:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <513A32AC.9010709@etorok.net> References: <513A32AC.9010709@etorok.net> Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 20:05:25 +0100 Message-ID: From: Florent Monnier To: caml-list@inria.fr Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?T=F6r=F6k_Edwin?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Validation-by: monnier.florent@gmail.com Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OpenGL mailing-list 2013/03/08, T=F6r=F6k Edwin wrote: > On 03/08/2013 08:27 PM, Florent Monnier wrote: >>> [...] http://lists.ocaml.org/, to improve their visibility, [...] >> >> What would you think about creating an ocaml-opengl mailing list too? >> (for generic ocaml/opengl) >> >> Most camelers are not interested by the topic, so we could post more >> things about it there without fear of annoying other people. >> > > Would OpenGL discussions be so high volume? > I don't remember seeing (m)any OpenGL related discussions since I've join= ed > this ML. If the ML would exist (at least I) would maybe post more things. And maybe even things that are related to the "details" category, that would for sure not fit the main ML. > Or is it about trying to unify the various existing OpenGL bindings? I don't know which direction to take, trying to unify them, take one and make it evolve, start something new from scratch, reuse something from another programming language... I would be pleased to get opinions from other people that care about this topic without anoying the others. Also, more important (IMO) about OpenGL version handling, this could be done in several ways. I don't know if such a discussion would grow or not. Maybe I would be the only one in it, or maybe other people would have something to say. In case it could grow this would not fit the main ML IMHO. --