From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <monnier.florent@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 101F47EE51
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Wed, 22 May 2013 19:30:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  monnier.florent@gmail.com) identity=pra;
  client-ip=209.85.212.181;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="monnier.florent@gmail.com";
  x-sender="monnier.florent@gmail.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of
  monnier.florent@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.181 as
  permitted sender) identity=mailfrom;
  client-ip=209.85.212.181;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="monnier.florent@gmail.com";
  x-sender="monnier.florent@gmail.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1"
Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@mail-wi0-f181.google.com) identity=helo;
  client-ip=209.85.212.181;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="monnier.florent@gmail.com";
  x-sender="postmaster@mail-wi0-f181.google.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArkBAI3/nFHRVdS1k2dsb2JhbABagzjBbn8IFg4BAQEBBwsLCRQEJIIkAQVAARseAwwGBQs7IgERAQUBHAaIDQEDD50ejD+CfYRgChknDViIEgEFDI5eOoNUA5c4gSmOMhYphDU8
X-IPAS-Result: ArkBAI3/nFHRVdS1k2dsb2JhbABagzjBbn8IFg4BAQEBBwsLCRQEJIIkAQVAARseAwwGBQs7IgERAQUBHAaIDQEDD50ejD+CfYRgChknDViIEgEFDI5eOoNUA5c4gSmOMhYphDU8
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,722,1363129200"; 
   d="scan'208";a="15328444"
Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com ([209.85.212.181])
  by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 22 May 2013 19:30:55 +0200
Received: by mail-wi0-f181.google.com with SMTP id hi5so1453096wib.14
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Wed, 22 May 2013 10:30:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=mOAdQSuFzc9jMQcVzdo5g+/rWtXZAH49yqnmSCK0mgo=;
        b=h0xcJXvg/gESpemHgAyvXRSLanKxD3gUYLPtxJSEioXA0jBO1ZWkauazWQioghtf1M
         cWYfzbxEpTmIC/DxYr0qjkAhH9vEZ2Q2lfD0EhVnx2jmSbleXOSGs+XxgIhqPn3MuAJ2
         UGgzrIed17t0wE/BBKCP0hV0MZi7gq2J2T6IVyf9KFJEBZohkMxAHrNQFzBv+3CU3Go5
         KP3Y3xs4Itw3hH/85Qku9Qgcczm7T0ns+eWWboqKuCb/7oaL927DF0nsySeJ8ZXfRstX
         B8URZZu6NQcpqixaUJE168IaBN2rXQNl11Z5HKgC/zlksYwF7k0Jpd08lU/G+T+OF1n9
         7p9A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.109.48 with SMTP id hp16mr16698080wib.24.1369243849469;
 Wed, 22 May 2013 10:30:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.108.6 with HTTP; Wed, 22 May 2013 10:30:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <43EBB6DDD855462F832285784167B846@erratique.ch>
References: <CAE1DttDGxQ0x_RBtvX6=rbivnr7ceOaT6EYmA9MzJ=+9c0OuEg@mail.gmail.com>
	<519CDB05.3010504@frisch.fr>
	<BF93BAF255A04406990006D8A1E9E672@erratique.ch>
	<20130522181802.7c42f9ef@xivilization.net>
	<43EBB6DDD855462F832285784167B846@erratique.ch>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 17:30:49 +0000
Message-ID: <CAE1DttCwLMufH70LNrW4gsRSgro0frOm+Ln2iiuXRToAgLDo1A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Florent Monnier <monnier.florent@gmail.com>
To: Caml List <caml-list@inria.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Validation-by: monnier.florent@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] [rpi] opam switch to get ocamlopt on RPi with
 raspbian

2013/05/22, Daniel B=FCnzli:
> Le mercredi, 22 mai 2013 =E0 17:18, Marek Kubica a =E9crit :
>> No need to increase swap, I built 4.00.1+rpi (the 4.00.1 with the ARM
>> patch for the RPi) on a 512 MB Raspberry Pi with the default 100 MB
>> swap that Raspbian creates.
>
> I don't know if that changed recently but a few month ago there was no sw=
ap
> in the raspbian distributed from raspberrypi.org (to avoid wearing the
> sdcard).
>
> Besides if you actually read the segfault that was in Florent's initial
> message, it's exactly the one that occurs when the system gets out of mem=
ory
> during camlp4's compilation.

In /boot/config I put:
gpu_mem_512=3D192
My swap is twice the RAM (512 * 2) which is what was adviced to my by
the other RPi users in my LUG.

Should I reduce the GPU memory?
Or remove the swap?

--