From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <hugo.heuzard@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B82787FCEF
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Thu,  2 Apr 2015 17:47:18 +0200 (CEST)
Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  hugo.heuzard@gmail.com) identity=pra;
  client-ip=209.85.212.172;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="hugo.heuzard@gmail.com";
  x-sender="hugo.heuzard@gmail.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of
  hugo.heuzard@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.172 as permitted
  sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.212.172;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="hugo.heuzard@gmail.com";
  x-sender="hugo.heuzard@gmail.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1"
Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@mail-wi0-f172.google.com) identity=helo;
  client-ip=209.85.212.172;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="hugo.heuzard@gmail.com";
  x-sender="postmaster@mail-wi0-f172.google.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DuAgD1Yx1VlKzUVdFcg1pcBYMQsjKEDIwPhXMCgT8HTAEBAQEBARIBAQEBBwsLCRIwQQKDXAEBBBIRHQEbEgsBAwwGBQsNAgIJHQICIgERAQUBChIGEwkJEId4AQMRDalDPjGLNoFrgneNMQoZJwMKVIRwAQEBAQEFAQEBAQEBFgEFDoETigiCXoFoMweCaIFFBYUQCoxWAYJuhguBV5EnEiOBDAmELCIxAYJCAQEB
X-IPAS-Result: A0DuAgD1Yx1VlKzUVdFcg1pcBYMQsjKEDIwPhXMCgT8HTAEBAQEBARIBAQEBBwsLCRIwQQKDXAEBBBIRHQEbEgsBAwwGBQsNAgIJHQICIgERAQUBChIGEwkJEId4AQMRDalDPjGLNoFrgneNMQoZJwMKVIRwAQEBAQEFAQEBAQEBFgEFDoETigiCXoFoMweCaIFFBYUQCoxWAYJuhguBV5EnEiOBDAmELCIxAYJCAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,511,1422918000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="108118457"
Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com ([209.85.212.172])
  by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 02 Apr 2015 17:47:17 +0200
Received: by wiaa2 with SMTP id a2so110275978wia.0
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 08:47:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=rvw9sUPt8Sp7fqRuZLrrqRtfUiE38Qdz6WJ9LfHxX2U=;
        b=VUgPW66oWjk/MjRGEEeFswZMuMwNWmaSIq0jqmWkj7Ya28Dtqqs/RN9g8/ybPW+DFH
         qeUIi+R9o9+rG9mqqJAfTddP1PTy6dpFOx32DqL+chGJRB4CYidllwwEf0t6Irzzp+1f
         o8YGjHIEZYpeVLrIgO/4s9jU36F22l6zlVMj5h14ZMDIZ2ephgUscQ6CGkclBVxLJEjV
         +q4qpkNurhry7vi0T+uGbjeiTnozTWujVa7LtPzZwTIQSaEwYzdbTz0S4dWmMkaKB/vw
         eY9ra5QS+4x8MQNiOtfTnaeiqDH15/Ny7lyI0UoY0o2/jd5P4sNS+uY2yJzrouudUaOj
         fUaQ==
X-Received: by 10.194.243.9 with SMTP id wu9mr5858929wjc.107.1427989637725;
 Thu, 02 Apr 2015 08:47:17 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.27.76.208 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 08:46:57 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <ebb918ce3a944148219a68a2db15aade@chimrod.com>
References: <ebb918ce3a944148219a68a2db15aade@chimrod.com>
From: hugo <hugo.heuzard@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 11:46:57 -0400
Message-ID: <CAEYcRDGxMT-MXOiHcwiU_3fBQKb=dLvOmbm2UEJeRaedQsJ_zw@mail.gmail.com>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?S=C3=A9bastien_Dailly?= <sebastien-ocaml@chimrod.com>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Strange result with Lexing

I guess you're using `Lexing.from_channel` with and `open_in`.
If so, you might want to use `open_in_bin` instead.

http://www.cycle.org/manuals/cygwin/using-textbinary.html

On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 11:22 AM, S=C3=A9bastien Dailly
<sebastien-ocaml@chimrod.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've found a strange result when calling Lexing.lexeme_start and
> Lexing.lexeme_end on DOS format file (with \r\n instead of \n).
>
> The value returned by the two functions is wrong when the file is in DOS
> format (the result does not change when I convert the file in UNIX format,
> but this is what I expect).
>
> I there something I misunderstood in the documentation ?
>
> (I've compiled ocaml with opam on cygwin).
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> S=C3=A9bastien Dailly
>
> --
> Caml-list mailing list.  Subscription management and archives:
> https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs