From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <krismicinski@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 690C37ED7A
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 03:18:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received-SPF: None (mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  krismicinski@gmail.com) identity=pra;
  client-ip=209.85.212.54;
  receiver=mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="krismicinski@gmail.com";
  x-sender="krismicinski@gmail.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: Pass (mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of
  krismicinski@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.54 as permitted
  sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.212.54;
  receiver=mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="krismicinski@gmail.com";
  x-sender="krismicinski@gmail.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1"
Received-SPF: None (mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@mail-vb0-f54.google.com) identity=helo;
  client-ip=209.85.212.54;
  receiver=mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="krismicinski@gmail.com";
  x-sender="postmaster@mail-vb0-f54.google.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApsCABRiXlDRVdQ2kGdsb2JhbABFvSMEfggjAQEBAQkJDQcUBCOCIAEBAQQSAiwBGxAKAwEDDAYFCwMKLiEBAREBBQEcBhMUDodQAQMPmXkJA4wmgnWEFwoZJw1ZiHQBBQyKLmI2hXQDlBCBVYsZgysWKYQj
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,469,1344204000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="174247834"
Received: from mail-vb0-f54.google.com ([209.85.212.54])
  by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 23 Sep 2012 03:18:22 +0200
Received: by vbmv11 with SMTP id v11so8592754vbm.27
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 18:18:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        bh=jgArpKSq4zKwqu9gpiflU8vjnUAhzPSFYZ7C8euObnM=;
        b=O+mvAQ4yvQXtCFsMLAE2VO5PB0o9r7xtxvIm9QXUnD1ShSiTbubE9balcI78p03roJ
         Qm1BXFx41k6l9NOKd7AhXhDf7emc1mkBvzKgVtwfmE9LFViAX2KOHdcTItlSi3fDJotF
         aqFRWscrlUwqDoWWjKSAkrWDstNUacgAtycNbSbU/xE73I8o+W0uoK1RoPmMUe0tdwgs
         VNctxMxCe/Q1EFI8SY/D48YS+eljwjVrQHK18OXNlyFGiiO1ugNA7FiaqXVWLt351Xh3
         0N/rvhxaJtvM0r1Ryj93LpRnuV/HnP8qf7Rs1GCrEA6oB4I2cpOg0k0bc+wdeJa4ioj+
         bH6g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.58.4.131 with SMTP id k3mr5358188vek.54.1348363101557; Sat, 22
 Sep 2012 18:18:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.58.95.104 with HTTP; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 18:18:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <505E578A.10207@gmail.com>
References: <5050A32C.9090809@inria.fr>
	<20120917.222210.832076572642519350.Christophe.Troestler@umons.ac.be>
	<505C6EAF.5080301@inria.fr>
	<CAF1Sy-HacK=k0MRhD74qABJwuheVqTWNjckzLr0E_dcJJnrZoA@mail.gmail.com>
	<505DBBB3.10105@inria.fr>
	<CAF1Sy-H_03zcCKcbqebq3XqSA6OdcjBEhhnnAMhgp_DX97NP4A@mail.gmail.com>
	<505E578A.10207@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 21:18:21 -0400
Message-ID: <CAF1Sy-GTBDi6h8bR49XA4+MnhaxXU3vNY2xHu9MvbVJPTK373A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Kristopher Micinski <krismicinski@gmail.com>
To: Edgar Friendly <thelema314@gmail.com>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Tuareg mode: Indentation of application arguments

On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 8:27 PM, Edgar Friendly <thelema314@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9/22/2012 2:13 PM, Kristopher Micinski wrote:
>>
>> ... indentation is something that requires
>>
>> human intelligence (and good indentation is an art rather than
>> science).
>
> I admit that under some circumstances, code can be made easier to read by
> giving it crafted indentation. But having a single indentation standard (and
> probably code layout) for all OCaml code would be better.  In exchange for
> the occasional inability to indent code for extra readability (maybe
> comments would suffice instead), we would gain a community-wide improvement
> in our ability to read each others' code.
>
> E.
>

To be honest, most of the time it doesn't matter, because whoever you
work for will enforce a coding standard...

kris