Re: [Caml-list] Anonymous sum types in functors

[Kristopher Micinski <krismicinski@gmail.com>]

Great, I googled for this, but didn't turn up anything: it seems
sensible this would exist.

Kris

On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Raphaël Proust <raphlalou@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Kristopher Micinski
> <krismicinski@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> The "reason" for wanting to avoid that in this instance is the specific application - the sets are actually bit masks and there are about 50 of them (using a code generator, unsurprisingly). Given that the ocamldoc output is already going to be interesting, I was trying to avoid having 100 modules if possible :o)
>>
>> This honestly sounds like something that you should be able to avoid
>> in OCamlDoc.  It seems sensible you should be able to mark things as
>> "don't generate documentation for these", but I havent' seen such.
>
> From: http://caml.inria.fr/pub/docs/manual-ocaml/manual029.html#toc120
>
> The special comment (**/**) tells OCamldoc to discard elements placed
> after this comment, up to the end of the current class, class type,
> module or module type, or up to the next stop comment.
>
>
> Cheers,
> --
> ______________
> Raphaël Proust