From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BA577FE44 for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 17:16:14 +0200 (CEST) IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:QnWN+xCz811ykRinxglLUyQJP3N1i/DPJgcQr6AfoPdwSP/7psbcNUDSrc9gkEXOFd2CrakV06yN6+u/BCQp2tWoiDg6aptCVhsI2409vjcLJ4q7M3D9N+PgdCcgHc5PBxdP9nC/NlVJSo6lPwWB6kO74TNaIBjjLw09fr2zQd+KyZ/vnL/vs7ToICxwzAKnZr1zKBjk5S7wjeIxxbVYF6Aq1xHSqWFJcekFjUlhJFaUggqurpzopM0r221qtvkg789NV7nhN+R9FOQATWcQCH0u/MDgqTXESAKO4DNcDjRXwVJ0BF3q5RvgX5r1+hDxtudn1TPSacL/R6o1VDDk9KxrRQXlkg8IMjc49Cfcjckm34xBpxf0iwF2xYOcQoaVMuF5eOuJcc4TQ2cHXMFRUTdGBKuzaoIOC6wKOuMO/Nq1nEcHsRbrXVrkP+jo0DIdwyKv0A== Authentication-Results: mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; spf=None smtp.pra=duane.johnson@gmail.com; spf=Pass smtp.mailfrom=duane.johnson@gmail.com; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster@mail-io0-f195.google.com Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of duane.johnson@gmail.com) identity=pra; client-ip=209.85.223.195; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="duane.johnson@gmail.com"; x-sender="duane.johnson@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of duane.johnson@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.195 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.223.195; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="duane.johnson@gmail.com"; x-sender="duane.johnson@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail-io0-f195.google.com) identity=helo; client-ip=209.85.223.195; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="duane.johnson@gmail.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mail-io0-f195.google.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CrAABiwn9Xf8PfVdFbhBR8Bqdcky0igj+BXIFbAoEgBzwQAQEBAQEBAQERAQEJCwsJHzGCMoIaAQEEARIRHQEbEgsBAwELBgULDQ0dAgIhAQERAQUBCgQBDQYTEgIOh3MBAw8IDqBqgTE+MYs7gWqCWgWFdgoZJwMKUoNUAQEBBwEBAQEBAQEYAgYQhheDSoEDgkOCK4IcOIJaBYZSDIcmdIloNIFag0lpgnqDNYIUgjiMdIgaCYYsEh6BDw8mgigcgWsdMgGJMQEBAQ X-IPAS-Result: A0CrAABiwn9Xf8PfVdFbhBR8Bqdcky0igj+BXIFbAoEgBzwQAQEBAQEBAQERAQEJCwsJHzGCMoIaAQEEARIRHQEbEgsBAwELBgULDQ0dAgIhAQERAQUBCgQBDQYTEgIOh3MBAw8IDqBqgTE+MYs7gWqCWgWFdgoZJwMKUoNUAQEBBwEBAQEBAQEYAgYQhheDSoEDgkOCK4IcOIJaBYZSDIcmdIloNIFag0lpgnqDNYIUgjiMdIgaCYYsEh6BDw8mgigcgWsdMgGJMQEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,330,1464645600"; d="scan'208,217";a="226102711" Received: from mail-io0-f195.google.com ([209.85.223.195]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-GCM-SHA256; 08 Jul 2016 17:16:12 +0200 Received: by mail-io0-f195.google.com with SMTP id s93so2590426ioi.3 for ; Fri, 08 Jul 2016 08:16:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=E9HidfRBwfyoD5CEO7nikAh2fwmuIUaidoAcB/lJjRs=; b=OSdHye5cXs1opMMW+FAKyKQEJ94Q+cQHrViAug/NIW3XiJN5phIZXVmnOJbsMCUFyW 6T7HGiJAes0sutPleoTHZmNzs3pN0qTw6na9eAzTNRqKxcovJ4UhX6V8UJsN2QhoocBg zdEtcoFv6kLN/o0kyGHlWXEE2MtZ8RvaCpKgR5RKbjFCZD1oOSkoUx78ZnLiiyKx0+XF 6uSTXsLzUKpMa95vd8C95cVjsIB/aOPwdxZ+myPpm2pa8z2ZUcfNSfr0oOWslOrRSXJq SrPO/T4+p2vRQ5IxGrfQtE2uBEQvjFEkKp2wG5aVvfuOkNrCzfoD7cv1PjwrcTx3bQ6O cLxw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=E9HidfRBwfyoD5CEO7nikAh2fwmuIUaidoAcB/lJjRs=; b=hN48i2YqI/aKiDxh/WxWiQlltm15f671SpB0DZWbKJ+SEQuE5hjNNExZrozAX+ls13 wVZ9W4/Q/0SozF0wKkmDvGgMimlfwbQVb1rdkdyPZxrRtKoCh/YcBJMkii9QbNBfB/rG A9oQiknBkv+7lqPdP8VgUw5M6VoRDjt6ec4vhTnWXHCUjzqAV2LFyr0NhXfQqxsQA5Wr gVSnnYlLJo3fCwtBA67/wJTeZuLvE3CsTFlGsbq34zNLdeXYVjdkg0BSJ3c3H+KQmOTo ZSIGkTSr5Av3QlvbEIS3q9zizWic8Njfp38KWaK7H5RJa8DLeFEr6yoSBAyheJgchhsV Gs1Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLIsRElOJ10kJpn7cP3m/WCipsYPfOJG3BpoXkoHsj2fxRbkRS4WC8sb60AXlZ1KQ3uZHvF4/lckO39+g== X-Received: by 10.107.195.140 with SMTP id t134mr10068504iof.175.1467990970979; Fri, 08 Jul 2016 08:16:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.64.14.5 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 08:16:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20160704144512.GB2458@Razor> From: Duane Johnson Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 09:16:09 -0600 Message-ID: To: Gabriel Scherer Cc: Dean Thompson , "caml-list@inria.fr" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c187d3e5c766705372148b5 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] how to encourage adoption of OCaml? --94eb2c187d3e5c766705372148b5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 8:40 AM, Gabriel Scherer wrote: > Adoption is interesting but, as Tony Hoare put it, we are not fashion > designers. The best thing I can think of is to communicate more and bette= r, > talk about the cool world that is being done in the OCaml communities, and > importantly talking about it outside it. Supporting software projects that > have a potential for impact outside the OCaml community is also key -- Co= q, > MLdonkey, Coccinelle, Flow, the SLAM static verifier toolkit, just to name > a few. As someone who just signed up to this mailing list, may I offer some observations? - my first impression of OCaml community was through reddit.com/r/ocaml. As a reddit user, I would rank /r/ocaml as "barely alive but stable"--in other words, the upvotes-per-thread there are in the single digits and low double-digits showing people exist there, but it is not a thriving community. - next, I tried to find a google group. It was hard to find any substantial and popular OCaml groups there. There was an OCaml aggregation list, but it wasn't clear that it was a discussion group. My first thought was, Is there no mailing list? I searched around and found the infria.fr domain. To an outsider, this lends no credibility or brand-name familiarity. Not only is the web domain unfamiliar, but the website does not look welcoming--it appears to be out of the 90s. - signing up for a mailing list is slow and unrewarding. I'd much rather sign up for a more modern community technology like reddit, facebook, slack, or google groups. - I clicked "Info" to get more info about the mailing list on infria.fr and it says "Private information" inside a white bubble. Ok... - I looked for a chat community, and IRC is the only option. This signals "old tech community" to me. Slack or gitter.im is a more inclusive, modern community. In order to participate in IRC, one must always be connected. This makes it more difficult for outsiders to come in and feel like they can 'catch up' on the conversation (Yes, I know there are chat logs, but this feature is not an integrated part of IRC). In summary, all of the signals that I usually depend on to evaluate the community around a technology are either weak or give me the impression of "old and barely stable". New, exciting technologies that I've seen tend to embrace and tap in to existing community platforms (slack, reddit, github, gitbook, google groups) in order to leverage the platform and amplify their advertising signal. Duane Johnson On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 8:40 AM, Gabriel Scherer wrote: > > Do others on this list feel the ramp to OCaml adoption is smoother than > my impression suggests? > > I can't speak for "adoption", but I think that you have been very kind as > far as user experience is concerned, that it is probably worse than you > suggest. > > We discussed some of these issues a few month ago in a thread launched by > Hendrik Bloom: > > Is OCaml for experienced beginners? > Hendrik Bloom, December 2015 > https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list/2015-12/msg00077.html > > I gave a few remarks on the evolution of the OCaml ecosystem on the period > I know of that you may be interested in: > https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list/2015-12/msg00110.html > > I think "adoption" and "usability" are interlinked but separate issues. > > Getting adoption distributes the number of people interesting in helping > on usability, so it tends to improve usability, but I tend to think that > the second is actually the more interesting, important goal to aim at. > > Adoption is interesting but, as Tony Hoare put it, we are not fashion > designers. The best thing I can think of is to communicate more and bette= r, > talk about the cool world that is being done in the OCaml communities, and > importantly talking about it outside it. Supporting software projects that > have a potential for impact outside the OCaml community is also key -- Co= q, > MLdonkey, Coccinelle, Flow, the SLAM static verifier toolkit, just to name > a few. > > Regarding usability, I think the tooling ecosystem is too complex today. > If I wanted to bootstrap a beginner to do stuff I would have to tell them > about the OCaml compiler tools (ocamlc, ocamlopt), ocamlfind, a build > system (omake or ocamlbuild for example), oasis, Merlin, opam, and get th= em > to learn either Vim or Emacs. That's a bit too much and even with the > plethora of tools there are problems we haven't really solved yet -- for > example, how to avoid module name conflicts. > I think a lot more work is required, both incremental improvements and a > few grand redesigns, before we reach a comfortable ecosystem where starti= ng > an OCaml project feels like a breeze. That's what I would aim at. > > Who here is excited about making OCaml approachable to newcomers? Where is >> the main ongoing work on this? Who are the main leaders from this >> perspective? >> > > This is an interesting question. To my knowledge, no one is specifically > focused on this mightily important question. But it's fair to assume that > we have no "usability team" today, it's more a distributed collection of > efforts going in all directions from various people, for example: > > - Gerd Stolpmann did a lot of work on the early language tooling, notably > GODI (an earlier ocaml-specific package manager) and ocamlfind, and also > kept very high documentation standards that are an example to follow. > > - Sylvain le Gall's work on OASIS helps a lot of developers do their > packaging by encapsulating, in particular, the knowledge of what to insta= ll > where (not a simple question). > > - The OPAM team as a whole, as well as the maintainers of the public opam > repository, have done tremendous work making OCaml software easy to insta= ll > and deploy. (Windows is still of a sore point, but there is progress in > that area. It's a distinct possibility that the OCaml ecosystem will beco= me > nice to use on Windows before Windows disappears or gets a real Unix > userland.) > > I would personally be interested in helping someone with a holistic > approach to usability devote as much of their time as they can. (I think > there are some sources of funding that could be considered, but nothing > very certain; from a crowd-funding perspective I would be glad to pay =E2= =82=AC30 a > month to fund such a position.) I think this is a difficult position > because there is a lot of thankless grunt work implied, and arguably it's > not a very career-advancing move. > > On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 8:57 AM, Dean Thompson > wrote: > >> Thank you, everyone, for the responses and discussion. If there is >> interest, I would still love to hear more thoughts about whether there i= s a >> roadmap (either de facto from the community, or explicit from leaders of >> the community) to foster broader adoption. >> >> I see that many organizations are making immense contributions to the >> community: from language and ecosystem enhancements, to Real World OCaml, >> to the OCaml Users and Developers Workshop. Technical progress is rapid. >> But so far, to me, these wonderful contributions feel more like giving b= ack >> to the community for us to make what we can of them, rather than anyone= =E2=80=99s >> systematic effort to streamline broader uptake of OCaml. >> >> These are the impressions of a newcomer. If there is interest, I would >> love to hear more seasoned viewpoints. >> >> Dean >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives: >> https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list >> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners >> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs >> > > --94eb2c187d3e5c766705372148b5 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 8:40 AM, Gabriel Scherer <gabriel.scherer@g= mail.com> wrote:
Adoption is interesting but, as Tony Hoare put it, we are not fashion designers. The best thing I can think of is to communicate more and better, talk=20 about the cool world that is being done in the OCaml communities, and=20 importantly talking about it outside it. Supporting software projects=20 that have a potential for impact outside the OCaml community is also key -- Coq, MLdonkey, Coccinelle, Flow, the SLAM static verifier toolkit,=20 just to name a few.


As someone who just signed up to this mailing=20 list, may I offer some observations?

- my first impression of OCaml community was through reddit.com/r/ocaml. As a reddit user, I would rank /r= /ocaml as "barely alive but stable"--in other words, the upvotes-= per-thread there are in the single digits and low double-digits showing peo= ple exist there, but it is not a thriving community.
- next, I tried to find a google group. It was hard to find a= ny substantial and popular OCaml groups there. There was an OCaml aggregati= on list, but it wasn't clear that it was a discussion group. My first t= hought was, Is there no mailing list? I searched around and found the infria.fr domain. To an outsider, this lends no= credibility or brand-name familiarity. Not only is the web domain unfamili= ar, but the website does not look welcoming--it appears to be out of the 90= s.
- signing up for a mailing list is s= low and unrewarding. I'd much rather sign up for a more modern communit= y technology like reddit, facebook, slack, or google groups.
- I clicked "Info" to get more info about t= he mailing list on infria.fr and it says &= quot;Private information" inside a white bubble. Ok...
- I looked for a chat community, and IRC is the only o= ption. This signals "old tech community" to me. Slack or gitter.im is a more inclusive, modern community. = In order to participate in IRC, one must always be connected. This makes it= more difficult for outsiders to come in and feel like they can 'catch = up' on the conversation (Yes, I know there are chat logs, but this feat= ure is not an integrated part of IRC).

In summary, all of the signals that I usually depend on to evaluate the= community around a technology are either weak or give me the impression of= "old and barely stable". New, exciting technologies that I'v= e seen tend to embrace and tap in to existing community platforms (slack, r= eddit, github, gitbook, google groups) in order to leverage the platform an= d amplify their advertising signal.

Duane Johnson


On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 8:= 40 AM, Gabriel Scherer <gabriel.scherer@gmail.com> w= rote:
>= ; Do others on this list feel the ramp to OCaml adoption is smoother than m= y impression suggests?

I can't speak for "adoption&qu= ot;, but I think that you have been very kind as far as user experience is = concerned, that it is probably worse than you suggest.

We disc= ussed some of these issues a few month ago in a thread launched by Hendrik = Bloom:

=C2=A0 Is OCaml for experienced beginners?
=C2=A0 He= ndrik Bloom, December 2015
I= gave a few remarks on the evolution of the OCaml ecosystem on the period I= know of that you may be interested in:
=C2=A0 https= ://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list/2015-12/msg00110.html

I think "adoption" and "usability" are interlink= ed but separate issues.

Getting adoption distributes the number of = people interesting in helping on usability, so it tends to improve usabilit= y, but I tend to think that the second is actually the more interesting, im= portant goal to aim at.

Adoption is interesting but, as Tony Hoare p= ut it, we are not fashion designers. The best thing I can think of is to co= mmunicate more and better, talk about the cool world that is being done in = the OCaml communities, and importantly talking about it outside it. Support= ing software projects that have a potential for impact outside the OCaml co= mmunity is also key -- Coq, MLdonkey, Coccinelle, Flow, the SLAM static ver= ifier toolkit, just to name a few.

Regarding usability, I= think the tooling ecosystem is too complex today. If I wanted to bootstrap= a beginner to do stuff I would have to tell them about the OCaml compiler = tools (ocamlc, ocamlopt), ocamlfind, a build system (omake or ocamlbuild fo= r example), oasis, Merlin, opam, and get them to learn either Vim or Emacs.= That's a bit too much and even with the plethora of tools there are pr= oblems we haven't really solved yet -- for example, how to avoid module= name conflicts.
I think a lot more work is required, both incremental i= mprovements and a few grand redesigns, before we reach a comfortable ecosys= tem where starting an OCaml project feels like a breeze. That's what I = would aim at.

Who = here is excited about making OCaml approachable to newcomers? Where=20 is the main ongoing work on this? Who are the main leaders from this=20 perspective?

This is an interesting que= stion. To my knowledge, no one is specifically focused on this mightily imp= ortant question. But it's fair to assume that we have no "usabilit= y team" today, it's more a distributed collection of efforts going= in all directions from various people, for example:

- Ge= rd Stolpmann did a lot of work on the early language tooling, notably GODI = (an earlier ocaml-specific package manager) and ocamlfind, and also kept ve= ry high documentation standards that are an example to follow.

- Sylvain le Gall's work on OASIS helps a lot of developers do th= eir packaging by encapsulating, in particular, the knowledge of what to in= stall where (not a simple question).

- The OPAM team as a= whole, as well as the maintainers of the public opam repository, have done= tremendous work making OCaml software easy to install and deploy. (Windows= is still of a sore point, but there is progress in that area. It's a d= istinct possibility that the OCaml ecosystem will become nice to use on Win= dows before Windows disappears or gets a real Unix userland.)

I would personally be interested in helping someone with a holistic ap= proach to usability devote as much of their time as they can. (I think ther= e are some sources of funding that could be considered, but nothing very ce= rtain; from a crowd-funding perspective I would be glad to pay =E2=82=AC30 = a month to fund such a position.) I think this is a difficult position beca= use there is a lot of thankless grunt work implied, and arguably it's n= ot a very career-advancing move.

On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 8:57 AM, Dean Thompson <deansherthompson= @gmail.com> wrote:
Thank yo= u, everyone, for the responses and discussion. If there is interest, I woul= d still love to hear more thoughts about whether there is a roadmap (either= de facto from the community, or explicit from leaders of the community) to= foster broader adoption.

I see that many organizations are making immense contributions to the commu= nity: from language and ecosystem enhancements, to Real World OCaml, to the= OCaml Users and Developers Workshop. Technical progress is rapid. But so f= ar, to me, these wonderful contributions feel more like giving back to the = community for us to make what we can of them, rather than anyone=E2=80=99s = systematic effort to streamline broader uptake of OCaml.

These are the impressions of a newcomer. If there is interest, I would love= to hear more seasoned viewpoints.

Dean






--
Caml-list mailing list.=C2=A0 Subscription management and archives:
https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocam= l_beginners
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs


--94eb2c187d3e5c766705372148b5--