From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C819D7FACC for ; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 09:04:31 +0200 (CEST) Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of martindemello@gmail.com) identity=pra; client-ip=209.85.220.180; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="martindemello@gmail.com"; x-sender="martindemello@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of martindemello@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.180 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.220.180; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="martindemello@gmail.com"; x-sender="martindemello@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail-vc0-f180.google.com) identity=helo; client-ip=209.85.220.180; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="martindemello@gmail.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mail-vc0-f180.google.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjkCALPT/lPRVdy0m2dsb2JhbABbhDcEgnjQfQGBEAgWEAEBAQEBBgsLCRQphAMBAQEDARIRHQEbHQEDAQsGBQQBBg0qAgIiAREBBQEcBhMiiAsBAwkInkBriyuBcoMQiSMKGScNZoRYEQEFDo58QgeCeYFTBYsqg3GNPZMoGCmFLx0vgQiBRwEBAQ X-IPAS-Result: AjkCALPT/lPRVdy0m2dsb2JhbABbhDcEgnjQfQGBEAgWEAEBAQEBBgsLCRQphAMBAQEDARIRHQEbHQEDAQsGBQQBBg0qAgIiAREBBQEcBhMiiAsBAwkInkBriyuBcoMQiSMKGScNZoRYEQEFDo58QgeCeYFTBYsqg3GNPZMoGCmFLx0vgQiBRwEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,416,1406584800"; d="scan'208";a="76922770" Received: from mail-vc0-f180.google.com ([209.85.220.180]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 28 Aug 2014 09:04:31 +0200 Received: by mail-vc0-f180.google.com with SMTP id lf12so371394vcb.11 for ; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 00:04:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Cd7sm6L1+V4uZfY9BXHL51DwZ5BJNKmXWD3zP2ko8Cw=; b=st5qURn8vSKdY6mHP2HMOnH/tRhuNowHcxHlMPBz9OPMyXsXJ3AniRaR04I3EqZGIo xV+9oCDvOWXN91GsQoC498y3bmz9DIL6eyBRd/nwcX5de6HnTNXBPmzn9UVdslxYA14w 0TbzU5FFFGY33QIMxL+YyGgWVp997koTHD8UfdK+qgjCaoiVwUDC+4/T/iSbu47T7X4B 4B/e6BdJTmMIYCGuNfevYTWVfe+rYrrDt4YJXrvytsS4vqX4Aml6TpwlCJxmfYqz8tf0 3uX4mqLeECsrPqIBHfldVBCDT94tNll7strLEdHU8vH0nXILTVpu0koXlXaJ0WKP4y+z lxdQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.185.193 with SMTP id fe1mr1378099vdc.31.1409209470278; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 00:04:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.3.78 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 00:04:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <53FED248.1070505@luminar.eu.org> References: <104D94B9C9544BA1823C6F27B8CBF90D@erratique.ch> <53FED248.1070505@luminar.eu.org> Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 00:04:30 -0700 Message-ID: From: Martin DeMello To: "Vincent B." Cc: Anil Madhavapeddy , =?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_B=C3=BCnzli?= , OCaml List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec548a399e3e23a0501ab25d4 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] is this an opam bug or something i'm doing wrong? --bcaec548a399e3e23a0501ab25d4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Vincent B. wrote: > On 28/08/2014 01:02, Martin DeMello wrote: > > I managed to fix it by uninstalling opam-git and installing opam; the > bug seems > > to be that while the opam-git package did update to 1.1 it never > triggered an > > update to my installation. > > > > martin > > > > Hi Martin, > > On Archlinux git packages are not upgraded on a package upgrade, there is > no way > AFAIK for the package manager to guess if a git package has been upgraded > or not. > > So this is normal. > > I recommand using only the "opam-git" package on Archlinux until a new OPAM > version is released. True; I'm not sure what exactly went wrong in my case but opam-git never updated anything, that is, it never recompiled the latest version even when there were pushes to the git repo. martin --bcaec548a399e3e23a0501ab25d4 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Vincent B. <vb@luminar.eu.org> wrote:
On 28/08/2014 01:02, Martin DeMello wrote:
> I managed to fix it by uninstalling opam-git and installing opam; the bug seems
> to be that while the opam-git package did update to 1.1 it never triggered an
> update to my installation.
>
> martin
>

Hi Martin,

On Archlinux git packages are not upgraded on a package upgrade, there is no way
AFAIK for the package manager to guess if a git package has been upgraded or not.

So this is normal.

I recommand using only the "opam-git" package on Archlinux until a new OPAM
version is released.

True; I'm not sure what exactly went wrong in my case but opam-git never updated anything, that is, it never recompiled the latest version even when there were pushes to the git repo.

martin
--bcaec548a399e3e23a0501ab25d4--