From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <martindemello@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC79D7FACE
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 22:26:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  martindemello@gmail.com) identity=pra;
  client-ip=209.85.220.178;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="martindemello@gmail.com";
  x-sender="martindemello@gmail.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: Pass (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of
  martindemello@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.178 as
  permitted sender) identity=mailfrom;
  client-ip=209.85.220.178;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="martindemello@gmail.com";
  x-sender="martindemello@gmail.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1"
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@mail-vc0-f178.google.com) identity=helo;
  client-ip=209.85.220.178;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="martindemello@gmail.com";
  x-sender="postmaster@mail-vc0-f178.google.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlsBAC8+/lPRVdyylGdsb2JhbABbhC0KBIJ40HsBgQoIFhABAQEBBwsLCRIrg3oKAQEDARIRHQEbHQEDDAYFAwEHNwICIQEBEQEFARwGEyKICwEDCQifAWuLK4FygxCJKgoZJw1mhFgRAQUOjRGCLQeCeYFTBYsqjx6CEI5jhEUYKYUvHS+CTwEBAQ
X-IPAS-Result: AlsBAC8+/lPRVdyylGdsb2JhbABbhC0KBIJ40HsBgQoIFhABAQEBBwsLCRIrg3oKAQEDARIRHQEbHQEDDAYFAwEHNwICIQEBEQEFARwGEyKICwEDCQifAWuLK4FygxCJKgoZJw1mhFgRAQUOjRGCLQeCeYFTBYsqjx6CEI5jhEUYKYUvHS+CTwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,413,1406584800"; 
   d="scan'208";a="91757465"
Received: from mail-vc0-f178.google.com ([209.85.220.178])
  by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 27 Aug 2014 22:26:07 +0200
Received: by mail-vc0-f178.google.com with SMTP id la4so218242vcb.37
        for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 13:26:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        bh=V/wDvI/S3Sx3hYFzttSLJsXp3a3NTB1eJ+oMjPSUdmk=;
        b=DlFlad7/MHBZp/tvnKnfxxcN7L0a9heMHZKkrQ6D4GJIqQvezwTtg+UNJ3Jg8u0LsD
         PNVwwxjUoi8A4kOpk9qvgX6uqJvSkeckiGMfJ9x9puKSV3f/DSCokym9hQVi4uYVt9ZV
         kXdI0FTvJO79QFqjguz3ovQCbEQxVAp56zVYnJ4LrqBPWnN945DhPlYrvl6iTXPxLWb7
         nB7erPMVrH4C2jrdLQdp21vZKgNXSIhO4Z3DGmMV1iepF6aJv4ogl40Fgw7YP6nxedKx
         7EGbNuzhAsDghjQKgf+f+bwp9RE/49UDAeroQR2h3HJKb0P8goRrr/9GXvFnJasHpi1U
         Wdqw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.243.229 with SMTP id xb5mr411417vdc.87.1409171165780;
 Wed, 27 Aug 2014 13:26:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.3.78 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 13:26:05 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAMu2m2L6VfCMHdYB5ChpNvUxXq18qo8DEO8DwF5mTDdm5ZRnJw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFrFfuHqMWZYWmKCCLHgVO2wHctw4ULyMBOCn-Hu-63PuzX_tg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFrFfuFrEcbCAovYXqBdrWL936roo_AQ7fBkwCkiq2jpNLfQzQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMu2m2L6VfCMHdYB5ChpNvUxXq18qo8DEO8DwF5mTDdm5ZRnJw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 13:26:05 -0700
Message-ID: <CAFrFfuGgR+gs6mQBoCzeLnruwZLDr=eo4-cFTJzktc3JL6MDeA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin DeMello <martindemello@gmail.com>
To: Ashish Agarwal <agarwal1975@gmail.com>
Cc: OCaml List <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c1c08ec3a36e0501a23ae7
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] is this an opam bug or something i'm doing wrong?

--001a11c1c08ec3a36e0501a23ae7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 5:53 AM, Ashish Agarwal <agarwal1975@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> Maybe you're saying this because 0.1.0 isn't listed in the
> available-versions field, but that field filters out versions you already
> have installed (in any switch). This always confuses me and think
> available-versions should just list all versions.
>

I'd definitely like to see that change! As a user the current way is very
confusing.

martin

--001a11c1c08ec3a36e0501a23ae7
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On W=
ed, Aug 27, 2014 at 5:53 AM, Ashish Agarwal <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=
=3D"mailto:agarwal1975@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">agarwal1975@gmail.com</=
a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra">=
<div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div class=3D""><br></div><div>Maybe you&#39;re =
saying this because 0.1.0 isn&#39;t listed in the available-versions field,=
 but that field filters out versions you already have installed (in any swi=
tch). This always confuses me and think available-versions should just list=
 all versions.</div>
</div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I&#39;d definitely like =
to see that change! As a user the current way is very confusing.</div><div>=
<br></div><div>martin=C2=A0</div></div><br></div></div>

--001a11c1c08ec3a36e0501a23ae7--