Even though the utop projects provides readline features, wouldn't it make sense to have basic feature support on the default repl for the language? On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 5:27 AM, Oliver Bandel wrote: > ...there also is "ledit" as support for the toplevel-usage. > > Maybe utop is what I could try also... > > > Zitat von Gabriel Scherer (Mon, 10 Aug 2015 > 11:24:15 +0200) > > Note that utop already provides these features and much more: >> https://github.com/diml/utop >> >> I'm not sure improving the toplevel is a good investment of your efforts, >> given that there exists such a nice alternative, and that the switching >> costs are basically zero for toplevels. >> >> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 1:37 AM, Dhaivat Pandya >> wrote: >> >> Hi, >>> >>> I was wondering if readline support for the OCaml toplevel would be >>> appreciated. I understand that running the repl with "rlwrap" solves a >>> similar problem but if we were to implement readline support, we may >>> later >>> on build on it with tab-completion, etc. >>> >>> If it is needed, I would be glad to implement support. >>> >>> - >>> Dhaivat >>> >>> >> -- >> Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives: >> https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list >> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners >> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs >> > > > > > -- > Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives: > https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs >