From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07BCB80161 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2017 01:45:41 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; spf=None smtp.pra=zhenya1007@gmail.com; spf=Pass smtp.mailfrom=zhenya1007@gmail.com; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster@mail-yb0-f179.google.com Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of zhenya1007@gmail.com) identity=pra; client-ip=209.85.213.179; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="zhenya1007@gmail.com"; x-sender="zhenya1007@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of zhenya1007@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.179 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.213.179; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="zhenya1007@gmail.com"; x-sender="zhenya1007@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail-yb0-f179.google.com) identity=helo; client-ip=209.85.213.179; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="zhenya1007@gmail.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mail-yb0-f179.google.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3AdCXmAxTTiYMNl4p9WpPvevgWGNpsv+yvbD5Q0YIu?= =?us-ascii?q?jvd0So/mwa69Yx2N2/xhgRfzUJnB7Loc0qyN4v+mATRIyK3CmUhKSIZLWR4BhJ?= =?us-ascii?q?detC0bK+nBN3fGKuX3ZTcxBsVIWQwt1Xi6NU9IBJS2PAWK8TW94jEIBxrwKxd+?= =?us-ascii?q?KPjrFY7OlcS30P2594HObwlSijewZbF/IA+qoQnNq8IbnZZsJqEtxxXTv3BGYf?= =?us-ascii?q?5WxWRmJVKSmxbz+MK994N9/ipTpvws6ddOXb31cKokQ7NYCi8mM30u683wqRbD?= =?us-ascii?q?VwqP6WACXWgQjxFFHhLK7BD+Xpf2ryv6qu9w0zSUMMHqUbw5Xymp4rx1QxH0li?= =?us-ascii?q?gIKz858HnWisNuiqJbvAmhrAF7z4LNfY2ZKOZycqbbcNgHR2ROQ9xRWjRBDI2y?= =?us-ascii?q?bIUBEvQPMvpDoobnu1cDtwGzCRWwCO7tzDJDm3/43bc90+QkCQzI0xIgH90Qv3?= =?us-ascii?q?TSrNT+KbscUeeozKbTzDXDae9Z2Tfh6IfWcxAhp+yHULVxcMrR10YvEQPEgU+N?= =?us-ascii?q?pYD5Iz+Y1P8As2ee7+V6VOKvj3QrpB12ojiq38ohjJTCiIENyl3c6yl13II4Kc?= =?us-ascii?q?e7RUN7e9KoDoZcui+AO4drQM4vR2dlszsgxLIco560Zi0KxYwnxxHBb/yHdJCF?= =?us-ascii?q?4hf5W+aQJTd0nXJkd6mjixqr/0is1+/xW82u3FZFqSpFldbMtnQT2BDJ9seHTf?= =?us-ascii?q?598l+g2TaJyQ/T9vlJLV4omaffMZIswb49moANvUjeECL6glj6ga2Se0k8/+in?= =?us-ascii?q?8eXnYrHopp+GMI90jxnzM6UumsOhB+Q5MhIBU3WH9eig1rDu5kL5QLBQgf03lq?= =?us-ascii?q?nVqozVJcMepqKhGQ9azp4j6wqjDzehyNkXgWMILFdBeB6ei4jpOkrOIOzjAPek?= =?us-ascii?q?g1WslS9ryOrcMr3gBJXNNHnDn637cbZz8U4PgDY0mPd07pdQQpQIIfbyXEC5kN?= =?us-ascii?q?3DEldtOAWxx6PjCc5h/oIYQ2OGRKGDZvD8q1iNs88xLOSKdccvvyv3Kv4u5+Lj?= =?us-ascii?q?jHlxzU0dcK+41MJPMC+QEfFvIkHfan3p1IRSWVwWtxYzGbS5wGaJViReMjPrB/?= =?us-ascii?q?ox?= X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0BUAwBeEEdZgLPVVdFcHgYMGBgHg3iBG?= =?us-ascii?q?AeDZIE2mSoBAQEGikKEPIoyDoh7B0MUAQEBAQEBAQEBAQESAQEJDQkIJjFCDoF?= =?us-ascii?q?jJAGCNzMdARseAxIIAQc3AiQBEQEFASKKJgEDCA2deoNFP4wIggQFARyDCQWDU?= =?us-ascii?q?woZJw1Wg3kCBhKGCo1EgmEFgSwBAQGVbYcoEAgBAYFHCg6SAJINk0EUH4EVNoE?= =?us-ascii?q?rdHdbhAqCLSQ2hFSFDQEBAQ?= X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0BUAwBeEEdZgLPVVdFcHgYMGBgHg3iBGAeDZIE2mSoBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?GikKEPIoyDoh7B0MUAQEBAQEBAQEBAQESAQEJDQkIJjFCDoFjJAGCNzMdARseA?= =?us-ascii?q?xIIAQc3AiQBEQEFASKKJgEDCA2deoNFP4wIggQFARyDCQWDUwoZJw1Wg3kCBhK?= =?us-ascii?q?GCo1EgmEFgSwBAQGVbYcoEAgBAYFHCg6SAJINk0EUH4EVNoErdHdbhAqCLSQ2h?= =?us-ascii?q?FSFDQEBAQ?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.39,358,1493676000"; d="scan'208,217";a="279509003" Received: from mail-yb0-f179.google.com ([209.85.213.179]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-GCM-SHA256; 19 Jun 2017 01:45:27 +0200 Received: by mail-yb0-f179.google.com with SMTP id e201so19801979ybb.1 for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2017 16:45:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=wfSg4EeLEXN/xSrFi9GyRXHkpXpi4BNHXn5bJhEt77A=; b=N17scTniKDb7Pk0Cpb35gIIuhwToDJ1rhoYm5tgfvsXPN12FCaGGfp6DlRYjkZu+h0 PrEjPwQTJQKVGTo5Bf0KXuOz9tTGjX3w8ozx3pIQjALrq903UDlmsvZMmbrWqgV1/Luh uFO9HKrF1e+a/LAifi0EDeA8JfXZ23ZpW+JRrhBkQZgQHBLBoGI67zlELjSe12COTxf1 PMvW/yNfN49VeZo5d/YCZdZ6gDRp4V5rPWbWYP0/j4GJ60ZodDMvm4I2DdnCwA6V2iN9 VWMBtS/gwDVSn2Sxj28pIesKxxoyWGwAsUCLjIPgZG1PAg/nDBUL7Z0VSNCLJrQ2XT2C Z0pw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=wfSg4EeLEXN/xSrFi9GyRXHkpXpi4BNHXn5bJhEt77A=; b=OycnKINQc7TX34c45l3tlBGVMEffaRt7TZy4Q2/RHpX/6Iu2ug/FAjo/pYarZA/3xy LdjI1bBQTtL/YvyUcWi0kmu3qZBEoqJbciNG6HVSZvafAm3s+HOj9KgV7z9xW3Sl96Vz T9FEfw0nc8roUbpzeL5CVcqWptbJHnk01moOnb5X0OmcPKIaw2xIllC/xFuTzvqekt+Q EoiUciM9SlJiLXut4ChZoujQitIrw8asTEKwqX4uQrO+TsWx5b0tOKiVqp06lP/wbUuN M10oFz6A3WTbmEEL26+DM0/FUeHL5wHOY46olVHcssb97NNUB56nHUEY2F7KMh+n0jYS sUGQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOxNitWVDARtlNeGMyzRMiTk4JcWMNBiU7fkpLXM9h34S48NPmp9 L6TMkZra8Kcd950avFd+LF7+NAkH/A== X-Received: by 10.37.87.132 with SMTP id l126mr17235124ybb.125.1497829525895; Sun, 18 Jun 2017 16:45:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.37.170.163 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Jun 2017 16:45:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Evgeny Roubinchtein Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2017 19:45:25 -0400 Message-ID: To: OCaml Mailing List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113e6dd8d345230552449c60" Subject: [Caml-list] One more question about Gc.finalise --001a113e6dd8d345230552449c60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Dear OCaml users and developers, I have one more question about Gc.finalise to which I couldn't find an answer in the documentation. Suppose I do, "Gc.finalise f v", and the function f makes the value v reachable again. If I want f to be called again should v become unreachable again, do I need to again call "Gc.finalise f v", after f has "revived" v? My experimentation _seems_ to suggest that I do, but there is always the danger that I am misinterpreting the results of my experiment. :-) Thank you in advance! -- Best, Zhenya --001a113e6dd8d345230552449c60 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dear OCaml users and developers,

I = have one more question about Gc.finalise to which I couldn't find an an= swer in the documentation.
Suppose I do, "Gc.finalise f = v", and the function f makes the value v reachable again.=C2=A0 If I w= ant f to be called again should v become unreachable again, do I need to ag= ain call "Gc.finalise f v", after f has "revived" v?=C2= =A0

My experimentation _seems_ to suggest that I do, but there is a= lways the danger that I am misinterpreting the results of my experiment. :-= )

Thank you in advance!

--
Best,
Zhenya
--001a113e6dd8d345230552449c60--