caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kakadu <kakadu.hafanana@gmail.com>
To: Francois Berenger <berenger@riken.jp>
Cc: OCaml Mailing List <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] an OCaml program profile
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 12:14:11 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGmVoG2yUrpSY=PbjSk2FszAQxP4SzgM7_BnQw-McPZScf9a=A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52293459.9060707@riken.jp>

I have had the same issue with my parser combinators this summer.
OCamlLex based lexer was allocating a lot during lexing phase nad
that's why my heap was consist of many small free block which couldn't
be used for new allocations. Increasing minor heap size fas a partial
solution. Running Gc.compact () manually was a main solution.

Happy hacking,
Kakadu

On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 5:48 AM, Francois Berenger <berenger@riken.jp> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am running experiments with a program.
> I'd like the program to run faster because
> it would reduce experiments round-trip.
>
> Here is the top of the profile:
> ---
> Flat profile:
>
> Each sample counts as 0.01 seconds.
>   %   cumulative   self              self     total
>  time   seconds   seconds    calls   s/call   s/call  name
>  58.07    132.13   132.13 161527987     0.00     0.00  caml_fl_allocate
>  21.13    180.21    48.08     2339     0.02     0.02  caml_fl_add_blocks
>   4.87    191.30    11.09     5497     0.00     0.00  mark_slice
>   1.65    195.06     3.76 979591485     0.00     0.00 caml_page_table_lookup
>   1.50    198.47     3.41     5620     0.00     0.00  sweep_slice
>   1.20    201.21     2.74 186584504     0.00     0.00  caml_oldify_one
>   1.04    203.57     2.36 134849325     0.00     0.00  compare_val
>   1.02    205.89     2.32 290049921     0.00     0.00  caml_float_compare
>   0.80    207.71     1.82 123048730     0.00     0.00  caml_hash
>   0.76    209.44     1.73 161525648     0.00     0.00  caml_alloc_shr
> ---
>
> I think the program spends most of its time doing garbage
> collection.
>
> How can I make it go faster?
>
> Would the OPAM switch 4.00.1+alloc-profiling (support allocation profiling
> on x86_64) would allow me to find the culprit function?
>
> If yes, how to use it?
>
> Thanks a lot,
> Francois.
>
> --
> Caml-list mailing list.  Subscription management and archives:
> https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs

  reply	other threads:[~2013-09-06  8:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-06  1:48 Francois Berenger
2013-09-06  8:14 ` Kakadu [this message]
2013-09-06  8:28 ` John Whitington
2013-09-06  8:49   ` Gabriel Scherer
2013-09-06  9:26     ` Francois Berenger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAGmVoG2yUrpSY=PbjSk2FszAQxP4SzgM7_BnQw-McPZScf9a=A@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=kakadu.hafanana@gmail.com \
    --cc=berenger@riken.jp \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).