From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FEA17EC6E for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 14:58:13 +0100 (CET) Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of kakadu.hafanana@gmail.com) identity=pra; client-ip=209.85.192.180; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="kakadu.hafanana@gmail.com"; x-sender="kakadu.hafanana@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of kakadu.hafanana@gmail.com designates 209.85.192.180 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.192.180; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="kakadu.hafanana@gmail.com"; x-sender="kakadu.hafanana@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail-pd0-f180.google.com) identity=helo; client-ip=209.85.192.180; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="kakadu.hafanana@gmail.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mail-pd0-f180.google.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhsDAC7w01LRVcC0lGdsb2JhbABAGoNDSgynUJIdgQgIFg4BAQEBBwsLCRIqgiUBAQEEQAEbEgsBAwwGBQsNDSEhAQERAQUBChIGExKHXQEDEQ02nUSMXIMJkRsKGScDCmSERhEBBQyMaIFgMweENwSPO4ZwgWyBMIsqg04YKYRZPA X-IPAS-Result: AhsDAC7w01LRVcC0lGdsb2JhbABAGoNDSgynUJIdgQgIFg4BAQEBBwsLCRIqgiUBAQEEQAEbEgsBAwwGBQsNDSEhAQERAQUBChIGExKHXQEDEQ02nUSMXIMJkRsKGScDCmSERhEBBQyMaIFgMweENwSPO4ZwgWyBMIsqg04YKYRZPA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,653,1384297200"; d="scan'208";a="53005613" Received: from mail-pd0-f180.google.com ([209.85.192.180]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 13 Jan 2014 14:58:12 +0100 Received: by mail-pd0-f180.google.com with SMTP id q10so7399700pdj.25 for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 05:58:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JYdvP7HqSQovzJl9SKSSuKZak4Cgo1wOo5OjJ8Nv5xs=; b=YuKBGqr9NLvBG7gTT/7txlaxVeO9L7YdYSVsWhrc4vPP+wZ0eNQyn6bhMQb0s9tLpp y+qVhxN18iZR/VTAUdIttbm+6QEhWM7wfxd3/uW4Ak/2mDLnaDTj4NMJsLiepxq38E5v LsYulOq29UuVvxOibinP23K3GRqV6WAlak7exExByowsetuO0UoYq34Mu+yia86Ra54J eRNitEDmLGAHI3Y4B0MWcGCjVZPdgq4DYnDbxetO0OhLlcnka8aRE7DfLUsBGFDUkfBt 0ta4VI2xUQ0/3jJ785dh9ZossFnwO5sKOhzXxRL8qPtyJXZOmOVJ+0zA7GK1JARaAJxO mm8w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.221.68 with SMTP id qc4mr29583303pbc.29.1389621491301; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 05:58:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.19.37 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 05:58:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20140111152357.GB28133@notk.org> <20140111154146.GA976@lenat> <20140113090444.GA8904@notk.org> <52D3B71B.40802@cea.fr> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 13:58:11 +0000 Message-ID: From: Kakadu To: Thomas Refis Cc: Gabriel Scherer , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Daniel_B=FCnzli?= , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois_Bobot?= , caml users Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Doing compiler patch review with a dedicated mailing-list Qt Gerrit [1] is the most fascinating review system I have ever seen. Everybody can push commits and add reviewers for it. CI is enabled for every change. Any chance that OCaml will have the same available? [1] https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,75024 Cheers, Kakadu On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Thomas Refis wrot= e: > 2014/1/13 Gabriel Scherer : >> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Daniel B=FCnzli >> wrote: >>> It's not only easy to browse, it's *great* to browse: all the web-based= mailing list archives I interact with are not even able to follow a thread= running across two month. I really feel we're in 2014. >> >> This is a bit too snarky for me to guess what you want. > > I'd have thought that part was pretty obvious. If the discussion > starts on the 28th of a month, and is continued the next month. The > "sympa" interface gives you no easy way to follow the thread. You need > to "select" the second month, and find the thread again. > >> I'm already doing a few reviews on mantis, and occasionally uses the >> github in-patch-commenting interface when people send a link to a >> github-hosted patch (eg. http://caml.inria.fr/mantis/view.php?id=3D6274 >> ). > > Since we're talking about it: I was a bit confused with that review. > Although *I* find the github interface nicer than mantis and the "in > patch comments" really useful, I didn't know whether I should answer > your comments on github or on mantis, and people on mantis might not > see the comments you did. > So I'm not sure that's really a good approach. (But of course that > particular patch was about ocamldoc, which no one really cares about, > so I guess that's ok) > > Thomas. > > -- > Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives: > https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs