caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pierre Chopin <pierre@punchup.com>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: [Caml-list] exn vs option
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 16:25:48 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGyUfm0SkjTVZ4hcQRNGThWWzGoXbbVnBXHBDcr1jP=6cFCMkQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1030 bytes --]

Hi,

I benchmarked two programs, in one case the main function throw an
exception that is caught, in the other the function returns an option that
is pattern matched on.

I noticed that, whether the exception is thrown or not, the option version
is always faster.

Is there any case where it makes sense, performance wise, to use exception
instead of 'a option ?

test1.ml
----------------------------------------------------------------------

exception Foo
let f x =
 if x =1 then raise Foo else ()

;;

 for i = 0 to 10_000_000 do
try
    f 1
with Foo -> ()
done
------------------------------------------------------------------------
test2.ml:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
let f x =
    if x=1 then None else Some ()

;;
for i = 0 to 10_000_000 do
    match f 1 with
        None -> ()
    |   Some s -> s
    done
------------------------------------------------------------------------



-- 
Pierre Chopin,
Chief Technology Officer and co-founder
punchup LLC
pierre@punchup.com

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1690 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2012-04-04 20:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-04 20:25 Pierre Chopin [this message]
2012-04-04 20:38 ` John Carr
2012-04-04 22:10   ` Julien Verlaguet
2012-04-05  1:29     ` Francois Berenger
2012-04-05  6:45 ` Raphael Proust
2012-04-05  7:53   ` Benedikt Grundmann
2012-04-05  9:05 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2012-04-05  9:50   ` Daniel Bünzli
2012-04-11 10:26     ` Goswin von Brederlow
2012-04-11 10:32       ` David House
2012-04-11 10:36         ` David House
2012-04-05 20:19   ` Pierre Chopin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAGyUfm0SkjTVZ4hcQRNGThWWzGoXbbVnBXHBDcr1jP=6cFCMkQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=pierre@punchup.com \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).