From: Xavier Leroy <xavier.leroy@college-de-france.fr>
To: Christophe Raffalli <christophe@raffalli.eu>
Cc: caml users <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Sequential speed 4.12.0 vs 4.13.1 vs multicore (Was: The road to OCaml 5.0)
Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2021 19:20:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAH=h3gHPepzVA0cHCkP+8qZ3_LTNLggpQdRWv+jtDyDE1ZE_gA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211009021049.2sqf3eqh3tsigseu@oulala>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 595 bytes --]
On Sat, Oct 9, 2021 at 4:11 AM Christophe Raffalli <christophe@raffalli.eu>
wrote:
> On 21-10-08 17:58:00, Michael Bacarella wrote:
> > My gut here says you're unwittingly comparing regular ocaml to flambda
> ocaml.
> >
> > https://ocaml.org/manual/flambda.html
> >
> > Perhaps multicore only comes in flambda flavor now (I notice it's not
> available
> > as a switch).
>
> No, I am using flambda on all versions.
>
Christophe: please put your benchmark online somewhere so that we can make
our measurements. Without reproducibility, your initial message is
useless. Thanks.
- Xavier Leroy
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1075 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-09 17:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-07 9:48 [Caml-list] The road to OCaml 5.0 Florian Angeletti
2021-10-08 1:42 ` Francois Berenger
2021-10-08 20:34 ` Christophe Raffalli
2021-10-09 0:07 ` [Caml-list] Sequential speed 4.12.0 vs 4.13.1 vs multicore (Was: The road to OCaml 5.0) Christophe Raffalli
2021-10-09 0:58 ` Michael Bacarella
2021-10-09 1:11 ` Michael Bacarella
2021-10-09 1:20 ` Michael Bacarella
2021-10-09 2:10 ` Christophe Raffalli
2021-10-09 17:20 ` Xavier Leroy [this message]
2021-10-10 3:37 ` Christophe Raffalli
2021-10-09 17:14 ` ygrek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAH=h3gHPepzVA0cHCkP+8qZ3_LTNLggpQdRWv+jtDyDE1ZE_gA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=xavier.leroy@college-de-france.fr \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=christophe@raffalli.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).