From: Thomas Braibant <thomas.braibant@gmail.com>
To: Roberto Di Cosmo <roberto@dicosmo.org>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Distributed computing libraries
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 16:43:44 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHR=Vkyra1adaei5LLqL5w8Buxm-J2q4JZ0=h9thBUTQGS_toA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120606202402.GA19265@voyager>
<snip>
> I think OCaml is a wonderful language, and it has the potential
> to attract much more users if we can make it easy to find, build,
> install, compare and assess the various libraries, packages
> and tools that are available.
I completely agree with what you just said, and that was the point of
my question: trying to assess, in a single thread, the various
possibilities that exist to solve a given problem [1]. Now, it happens
that I had been thinking about the same kind of mail about package
managers, because there is also a huge variety of solutions. So, I
could ask, what are the pros and cons of the following package
managers?
- https://github.com/thelema/odb
- https://github.com/hcarty/ocamlbrew
- https://github.com/OCamlPro/opam
- http://godi.camlcity.org/godi/index.html
- http://oasis.forge.ocamlcore.org/oasis-db.html
But I do not want to fork that thread yet ;).
I think a more general perspective on this was given a while ago on
this list by Xavier, a while ago on this list (trying to paraphrase):
- the community needs a common packaging system
- there is often a lack of convergence between related projects (in
this case, libraries, for instance).
> And for each "feature" of the language, I'd love to see tutorials,
> code examples, pointers to the relevant literature, and to
> packages showing them off.
On a related note, I was delighted to see that there are two books
about OCaml in the pipes currently, and I think this is great.
Thomas
[1] Actually, I did that also a while ago, about openGL bindings, and
the following discussion was quite fruitful
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-06 20:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-06 16:53 Thomas Braibant
2012-06-06 17:31 ` oliver
2012-06-06 17:34 ` Vincent Aravantinos
2012-06-06 18:01 ` AW: " Gerd Stolpmann
2012-06-06 18:16 ` Edgar Friendly
2012-06-06 18:18 ` oliver
2012-06-06 18:35 ` AW: " Gerd Stolpmann
2012-06-06 18:44 ` Edgar Friendly
2012-06-06 20:52 ` Thomas Braibant
2012-06-07 1:34 ` Francois Berenger
2012-06-07 15:44 ` Thomas Braibant
2012-06-08 0:53 ` Francois Berenger
2012-06-08 6:36 ` Francois Berenger
2012-06-06 20:24 ` Roberto Di Cosmo
2012-06-06 20:43 ` Thomas Braibant [this message]
2012-06-07 1:48 ` [Caml-list] OCaml package managers Francois Berenger
2012-06-06 22:23 ` [Caml-list] Distributed computing libraries Ashish Agarwal
2012-06-08 6:55 ` Roberto Di Cosmo
2012-06-11 14:48 ` Ashish Agarwal
2012-06-08 8:58 ` jean-marc alliot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAHR=Vkyra1adaei5LLqL5w8Buxm-J2q4JZ0=h9thBUTQGS_toA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=thomas.braibant@gmail.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=roberto@dicosmo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).