Re: [Caml-list] Distributed computing libraries

[Thomas Braibant <thomas.braibant@gmail.com>]

> These are very different pieces of software, because they tackle problems at
> various abstraction levels. ocmc is the most level-level here, as it "only"
> tries to improve the runtime so that threads can be run in parallel on
> multiple cores. That's it, there is no additional abstraction on top of the
> standard threading API - no distribution, no computing.
>
> JoCaml uses the normal multi-threading in the runtime, but integrates it
> differently into the language. So, it adds abstraction, but you are still
> limited to a single core.
>
> So far I know, all the other libraries base on multi-processing to run
> programs on multiple cores. Plasma is the only one with true distribution
> capabiltiies beyond a single computer, but the price is that you must use
> the map/reduce scheme, whereas functory or parmap leave you more freedom.
> However, all multi-processing approaches share the property that the data
> flow is limited by process boundaries (unless you go really low-level and
> also take Netmulticore into consideration (part of Ocamlnet), which uses
> shared memory to overcome these limitations).
>
> I don't know what you are exactly looking for. Knowing the problem it would
> be easier to recommend something.

Thanks a lot for this answer.

As I said in another email, I do not have a problem to solve right
now. But, I was tickled by the Parmap announce, and I wondered how it
fared with the other related systems I knew about. (Yet, I reckon that
I should have made the question more precise, with a detailed lists of
criteria, akin to what Oliver suggested.)

In my mind, asking on the list was the best way to make a good summary
of the current situation on this front. (But I am afraid I do not know
the best place to make public this kind of summaries.)