caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Diego Olivier Fernandez Pons <dofp.ocaml@gmail.com>
To: caml-list <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: [Caml-list] Why isn't there a common platform for functional language interaction ?
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 11:36:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHqiZ-+bDbKmakxt+f9P-FwMbwVcoYaaaUO2B_gQbqygfmfbgA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1014 bytes --]

    Caml-list,

Given that other people are raising trolls, here is mine...

I have to admit I appreciate F# transparent interaction with C# libraries
which allows me to use large amounts of code that I would have had to
poorly rewrite otherwise (GUI, database, web stuff, etc). Same happens with
SML, Caml, Haskell and F#, some pieces of code are just way better in one
language than in the others, and you end partially porting these libraries
to Caml which is a waste of time and you don't benefit from the updates of
the original code and nobody but you can maintain your quick-and-dirty port.

Why isn't there a core functional languages to which everyone could
compile, on which the compiler research could be done (certification,
optimisation, garbage collection) and that would allow full interaction of
the different dialects at run-time ?

At some point I thought that C-- (http://www.cminusminus.org/index.html)
and that type of work would converge to that but it never happened.

        Diego Olivier

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1113 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2011-12-10 10:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-10 10:36 Diego Olivier Fernandez Pons [this message]
2011-12-10 12:23 ` Stéphane Glondu
2011-12-10 12:38   ` rixed
2011-12-10 13:54     ` oliver
2011-12-10 12:58 ` Gabriel Scherer
2011-12-10 18:00   ` Florian Hars
2011-12-10 20:44   ` Diego Olivier Fernandez Pons
2011-12-10 21:14     ` Philippe Strauss
2012-11-18 17:26     ` Jon Harrop
2011-12-10 14:15 ` Jon Harrop

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAHqiZ-+bDbKmakxt+f9P-FwMbwVcoYaaaUO2B_gQbqygfmfbgA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=dofp.ocaml@gmail.com \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).