From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105])
	by walapai.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id q02MblKe023751
	for <caml-list@sympa-roc.inria.fr>; Mon, 2 Jan 2012 23:37:47 +0100
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AisEAIUxAk/RVdS2kGdsb2JhbABDggWqTQgiAQEBAQkJDQcUBCGBaQUdAiwBGx4DEggBAgVdAREBBQEiGxqFJoIplVqCWwqLZYJrg3o/iHECBQuMBASVAo19PYN7
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,446,1320620400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="125338908"
Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com ([209.85.212.182])
  by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 02 Jan 2012 23:37:21 +0100
Received: by wibhr1 with SMTP id hr1so16169929wib.27
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Mon, 02 Jan 2012 14:37:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=j06VzF0388TKsXW3cg3hoFnUsTHupjl+I9EeA85TafU=;
        b=G9nHk5qU0i8IYbd1TrqYMR9Pyy3TOWXXBpshy+8oEYZVy4/Hf/jlSJwvhQfZ1o4VaT
         4x7zgZh9WFh4kaiHaf4UN5TKb+1NFy/tezeKUO8dUiQsgRUTRCdHT8LoZwhyPzpzmi3J
         Wg84bYYD4pY7MM2ZqDHhlYMZamp8OP76rxClw=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.180.75.7 with SMTP id y7mr11771827wiv.2.1325543840921; Mon, 02
 Jan 2012 14:37:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.216.65.129 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Jan 2012 14:37:20 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2012 23:37:20 +0100
Message-ID: <CAHqiZ-LhsBa4Xn51dCDAeOpTVMzF8kJCestAGydh5abMHsOidQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Diego Olivier Fernandez Pons <dofp.ocaml@gmail.com>
To: caml-list <caml-list@inria.fr>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0434bf56c5b73104b593397b
Subject: [Caml-list] Examples where let rec is undesirable


--f46d0434bf56c5b73104b593397b
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

    List,

I was wondering if there was any reason not to make "let rec" the default /
sole option, meaning cases where you clearly don't want a "let rec" instead
of "let" (only in functions, not cyclic data).

         Diego Olivier

--f46d0434bf56c5b73104b593397b
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

=A0 =A0 List,<div><br></div><div>I was wondering if there was any reason no=
t to make &quot;let rec&quot; the default / sole option, meaning cases wher=
e you clearly don&#39;t want a &quot;let rec&quot; instead of &quot;let&quo=
t; (only in functions, not cyclic data).</div>
<div><br></div><div>=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Diego Olivier</div>

--f46d0434bf56c5b73104b593397b--