From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dofp.ocaml@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D11617ED45
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 00:19:10 +0200 (CEST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgkCADWR509KfVI0jmdsb2JhbABEDrVmCCIBAQEBCQsJCRIGI4IYAQEBAwESAiwBGx0BAwELBgULOyIBEQEFARwGNYdaAQMGBZo6CQOMI4Jxg38KGScNV4hxAQUMkSkDlS6JJoR+PoNFOw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,468,1336341600"; 
   d="scan'208";a="164230324"
Received: from mail-wg0-f52.google.com ([74.125.82.52])
  by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 25 Jun 2012 00:19:10 +0200
Received: by wgbgn7 with SMTP id gn7so3528410wgb.9
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 15:19:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=op1VBsLywfPhBb4+TRE4nEtGiUJbSIWfcWviPacrBDw=;
        b=Js0YSZN3e9TZYm3RIY5Vqq2rK0L4NFQNPZ+8hPma05oLRQHVFwmzMUolqR/ildssAQ
         OWhtkAypeUhftxPd9iK8aLYljEhib1CkCLl9Gfa80DLlyKQaORxwcBhwnAl5910OpEwh
         wmZGhqnQCjWpbCE4HzUzIflN13Xunhxs4WdgpuF92ugomjy8pkT+RJ/s477yGTvVccS3
         7Ccwu/CqzCs0j6+2uL/lLHUEmn/N0mcNqp1o3VjdT6pKQ+AH4R61VFQV4B+oJT4NzxaG
         eu3yCgjQ6a5vKy5oFjogOYYbe6W/PEViuzIIMkCNjXQaDAP09is4e42mQ/hJWxaZxVL8
         Jr2A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.150.166 with SMTP id z38mr5132642wej.78.1340576350355;
 Sun, 24 Jun 2012 15:19:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.217.1.8 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 15:19:10 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20120624.220220.2022399462583597382.Christophe.Troestler@umons.ac.be>
References: <CAHqiZ-KRTmTC4196dikqj8B5t4F84xEJTONaX4+Ns2UhjgeJtQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120624211840.124466j26yxz6rkg@webmail.in-berlin.de>
	<CAHqiZ-JOw4n1bZO_WiS5qpyHLHfK3epz0WuL2nnB36B61y=4cA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120624.220220.2022399462583597382.Christophe.Troestler@umons.ac.be>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 00:19:10 +0200
Message-ID: <CAHqiZ-Lmhyn1tXihc-5hmjdy7Bgqo3nq_ifdBsoidYO-80SPfQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Diego Olivier Fernandez Pons <dofp.ocaml@gmail.com>
To: Christophe TROESTLER <Christophe.Troestler@umons.ac.be>
Cc: OCaml Mailing List <caml-list@inria.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] print_int is too slow

    Christophe,

> The culprit is not with print_int but with =93print_newline ()=94 which
> forces the ouput to be flushed. =A0As you discovered experimentally,
> doing this often will slow down your output.

During all the years I have been coding, I had never had to worry
about flushing I/O (when / why / how) in any language (C/C++, Java, C#
and OCaml).
I actually had even forgotten those things existed...

        Diego Olivier