From: Fabrice Le Fessant <Fabrice.Le_fessant@inria.fr>
To: r.3@libertysurf.fr
Cc: Ocaml Mailing List <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] opam and godi
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 08:55:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHvkLrMHZi-SCUPEM1VzZUnifEjBpLjt-Y1ycDR8sk4iExN-nA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <383739793.214096184.1374254520546.JavaMail.root@zimbra27-e5.priv.proxad.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 881 bytes --]
Hello,
Looking only at the number of packages available in the repositories,
Opam has around 400 packages while Godi has around 170 packages. Also, Opam
can use "aspcud" to compute the minimal number of changes when
installing/updating, which can make a big difference when dependency
constraints between packages become hard to solve. I also like the
interface "à la apt-get", compared to the curses interface that I used with
Godi.
--Fabrice
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 7:22 PM, <r.3@libertysurf.fr> wrote:
> Hello,
> could someone explain please the relation between godi and opam ? Is it
> concurrent ?
> Godi has been there for some time, and works quite nicely. So what are
> differences ?
> Thanks,
> William
>
--
Fabrice LE FESSANT
Chercheur en Informatique
INRIA Paris Rocquencourt -- OCamlPro
Programming Languages and Distributed Systems
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1476 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-22 6:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <51E40425.8060604@libertysurf.fr>
2013-07-15 14:20 ` [Caml-list] ocaml glade gtk3 r.3
2013-07-15 19:18 ` Martin DeMello
2013-07-19 17:22 ` [Caml-list] opam and godi r.3
2013-07-21 13:54 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2013-07-21 14:20 ` Anil Madhavapeddy
2013-07-21 14:43 ` Yaron Minsky
2013-07-22 7:44 ` Adrien Nader
2013-07-22 13:30 ` Anil Madhavapeddy
2013-07-22 8:06 ` Török Edwin
2013-07-22 12:20 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2013-07-22 12:55 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2013-07-22 18:30 ` Yaron Minsky
2013-07-22 13:51 ` David Scott
2013-07-22 6:55 ` Fabrice Le Fessant [this message]
2013-07-22 7:35 ` Francois Berenger
2013-07-22 7:46 ` Adrien Nader
2013-07-22 12:34 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2013-07-22 7:20 ` Matthieu Dubuget
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAHvkLrMHZi-SCUPEM1VzZUnifEjBpLjt-Y1ycDR8sk4iExN-nA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=fabrice.le_fessant@inria.fr \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=r.3@libertysurf.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).