* [Caml-list] meetup OCaml-Pairs (OUPS), mercredi 9 octobre à l'IRILL
@ 2013-09-27 11:43 Fabrice Le Fessant
2013-09-27 12:40 ` Alan Schmitt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Fabrice Le Fessant @ 2013-09-27 11:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ocaml Mailing List
A short message in French, to give the program of the next OCaml-Paris
meetup, on Wednesday,Octobre 9, at 19:30 at IRILL :
La prochaine rencontre du Meetup OCaml-Paris (OUPS) aura lieu le
mercredi 9 octobre à l'IRILL, comme d'habitude.
Au programme, à partir de 19h30 :
* Romain Bardou : "Procord: une librairie portable pour déléguer des
calculs à d’autres processus"
* Xavier Clerc : "Nouveautés dans OCamlJava"
* Jane Street : "Jenga: towards a correct and scalable build system"
* Adrien Nader : "Mieux comprendre et utiliser le binding LablGTK"
Nous aurons cette fois deux sponsors pour le pot qui suivra, Jane
Street et Lexifi !
Inscrivez-vous nombreux !
http://www.meetup.com/ocaml-paris/events/140667882/
--
Fabrice LE FESSANT
Chercheur en Informatique
INRIA Paris Rocquencourt -- OCamlPro
Programming Languages and Distributed Systems
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] meetup OCaml-Pairs (OUPS), mercredi 9 octobre à l'IRILL
2013-09-27 11:43 [Caml-list] meetup OCaml-Pairs (OUPS), mercredi 9 octobre à l'IRILL Fabrice Le Fessant
@ 2013-09-27 12:40 ` Alan Schmitt
2013-09-27 15:03 ` Gabriel Scherer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alan Schmitt @ 2013-09-27 12:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fabrice Le Fessant; +Cc: Ocaml Mailing List
Hello,
Fabrice.Le_fessant@inria.fr writes:
> * Jane Street : "Jenga: towards a correct and scalable build system"
I've been searching my mail archives and I could not find an official
announcement of Jenga (it was alluded to in the announcement of Core
Suite 109.11, then mentioned in further announcements and in the
ocamlbuild thread of late July). I had a look at the examples in the
github repository, and it looks like a very verbose way of writing
dependencies (see for instance
https://github.com/janestreet/jenga/blob/master/examples/hello/JengaRoot.ml).
I'm sure I'm missing the motivation behind this new build system. How
does it compare to the existing ones?
Thanks,
Alan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] meetup OCaml-Pairs (OUPS), mercredi 9 octobre à l'IRILL
2013-09-27 12:40 ` Alan Schmitt
@ 2013-09-27 15:03 ` Gabriel Scherer
2013-09-27 21:38 ` Fabrice Le Fessant
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Gabriel Scherer @ 2013-09-27 15:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Schmitt; +Cc: Fabrice Le Fessant, Ocaml Mailing List
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1669 bytes --]
My understanding is that this OUPS meeting is precisely intended to
coincide with an "official annoucement" of the system, so I would recommend
waiting for a couple more weeks before looking at the system (surely they
have polishing planned before that) and discussing it.
I would tend to agree with your implicit remark about unclear project
status (internal/external, announced/secret, released/experimental) in the
general case; but I understand that everyone is free to handle their
project as they deem acceptable. I'm personally fine with waiting a bit --
and this is still better than ocp-build or ocaml-java.
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Alan Schmitt <
alan.schmitt@polytechnique.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Fabrice.Le_fessant@inria.fr writes:
>
> > * Jane Street : "Jenga: towards a correct and scalable build system"
>
> I've been searching my mail archives and I could not find an official
> announcement of Jenga (it was alluded to in the announcement of Core
> Suite 109.11, then mentioned in further announcements and in the
> ocamlbuild thread of late July). I had a look at the examples in the
> github repository, and it looks like a very verbose way of writing
> dependencies (see for instance
> https://github.com/janestreet/jenga/blob/master/examples/hello/JengaRoot.ml
> ).
>
> I'm sure I'm missing the motivation behind this new build system. How
> does it compare to the existing ones?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alan
>
> --
> Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives:
> https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2571 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] meetup OCaml-Pairs (OUPS), mercredi 9 octobre à l'IRILL
2013-09-27 15:03 ` Gabriel Scherer
@ 2013-09-27 21:38 ` Fabrice Le Fessant
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Fabrice Le Fessant @ 2013-09-27 21:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gabriel Scherer; +Cc: Alan Schmitt, Ocaml Mailing List
Hi Gabriel,
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Gabriel Scherer
<gabriel.scherer@gmail.com> wrote:
> deem acceptable. I'm personally fine with waiting a bit -- and this is still
> better than ocp-build or ocaml-java.
I don't understand what you mean exactly by this remark on ocp-build.
Could you clarify ?
--Fabrice
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-09-27 21:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-09-27 11:43 [Caml-list] meetup OCaml-Pairs (OUPS), mercredi 9 octobre à l'IRILL Fabrice Le Fessant
2013-09-27 12:40 ` Alan Schmitt
2013-09-27 15:03 ` Gabriel Scherer
2013-09-27 21:38 ` Fabrice Le Fessant
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).