caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fabrice Le Fessant <Fabrice.Le_fessant@inria.fr>
To: "Soegtrop, Michael" <michael.soegtrop@intel.com>,
	 Jonathan Protzenko <jonathan.protzenko@gmail.com>,
	"Petter A. Urkedal" <paurkedal@gmail.com>,
	 Gabriel Scherer <gabriel.scherer@gmail.com>
Cc: "caml-list@inria.fr" <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ocambuild vs ocamldep circular dependencies
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 15:56:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHvkLrMvitqGW6xOAE8opVjkkPgiiKhHOOMLB+tzYjMPgEb4NA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0F7D3B1B3C4B894D824F5B822E3E5A172CF20C2B@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2332 bytes --]

FWIW, `ocp-build` has a specific variable to overcome `ocamldep`
limitations.

You can for example describe a library like that:

```
begin library "foobar"
  requires = [ "unix" "my-other-lib" ]
  files = [
       "bar.ml" (nodeps = [ "Foo" ])    (*   <---- module Bar does not
depend on Foo, even if `ocamldep` says the contrary *)
       "foo.ml"
   ]
end
```

It also has a specific algorithm to discover cycles in build rules and
display the cycle in a user-friendly fashion, so that finding the arguments
for `nodeps` becomes easier.

--Fabrice



On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 5:33 PM Soegtrop, Michael <
michael.soegtrop@intel.com> wrote:

> Dear OCaml Users,
>
> a note for those reading this thread later:
>
> I finally used the module rec approach as outlined by Petter A. Urkedal in
> his previous post, although some people said in various places that this is
> overkill if you have issues with just a few functions. The module structure
> implied by the module rec approach was in the end nicer than my original
> module structure (which didn't work cause of the circular dependency). It
> was also much less work to restructure the modules than I thought. I tried
> several other approaches (function references, putting all functions
> calling each other into one file, treat mli and ml files separately in the
> build system), but they all appeared to be inferior, either in terms of
> effort or in terms of clarity, usually both.
>
> So I came to the conclusion that long term there is no issue with properly
> declaring recursive module structures using "module rec", although it can
> be quite a pain short term. For resolving some short term hacks (e.g. for
> experiments), one can still use the function reference approach.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Michael
>
> Intel Deutschland GmbH
> Registered Address: Am Campeon 10-12, 85579 Neubiberg, Germany
> Tel: +49 89 99 8853-0, www.intel.de
> Managing Directors: Christin Eisenschmid, Christian Lamprechter
> Chairperson of the Supervisory Board: Nicole Lau
> Registered Office: Munich
> Commercial Register: Amtsgericht Muenchen HRB 186928
>
> --
> Caml-list mailing list.  Subscription management and archives:
> https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3401 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-11 15:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-09 12:53 Soegtrop, Michael
2016-07-09 13:45 ` Gabriel Scherer
2016-07-09 15:16   ` Soegtrop, Michael
2016-07-09 16:16     ` Petter A. Urkedal
2016-07-09 20:09       ` Jonathan Protzenko
2016-07-11  7:59         ` Soegtrop, Michael
2016-07-11 15:32           ` Soegtrop, Michael
2016-07-11 15:56             ` Fabrice Le Fessant [this message]
2016-07-12  8:33   ` Goswin von Brederlow

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAHvkLrMvitqGW6xOAE8opVjkkPgiiKhHOOMLB+tzYjMPgEb4NA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=fabrice.le_fessant@inria.fr \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    --cc=gabriel.scherer@gmail.com \
    --cc=jonathan.protzenko@gmail.com \
    --cc=michael.soegtrop@intel.com \
    --cc=paurkedal@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).