From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A9247F1AA for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 01:36:45 +0200 (CEST) IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:2LmRvReJTRKd568Yp3Ae+765lGMj4u6mDksu8pMizoh2WeGdxc65bR7h7PlgxGXEQZ/co6odzbGG7+a5BCdavN6oizMrTt9lb1c9k8IYnggtUoauKHbQC7rUVRE8B9lIT1R//nu2YgB/Ecf6YEDO8DXptWZBUiv2OQc9HOnpAIma153xjLDuvcSOKF8VzBOGIppMbzyO5T3LsccXhYYwYo0Q8TDu5kVyRuJN2GlzLkiSlRuvru25/Zpk7jgC86l5r50IAu3GePEfZrVdCHxyOGkw4IjvtALfZQqJ/HoVFGsMxElmGQ/AuSvzWYr1+gfntec1jDOTOtDyQZg7XD2j6+FgTxq+23RPDCIw7GyC0p84t6lcuh/0/xE= Authentication-Results: mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; spf=None smtp.pra=raould@gmail.com; spf=Pass smtp.mailfrom=raould@gmail.com; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster@mail-ob0-f176.google.com Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of raould@gmail.com) identity=pra; client-ip=209.85.214.176; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="raould@gmail.com"; x-sender="raould@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of raould@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.176 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.214.176; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="raould@gmail.com"; x-sender="raould@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail-ob0-f176.google.com) identity=helo; client-ip=209.85.214.176; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="raould@gmail.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mail-ob0-f176.google.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AvDQBxwfBVlLDWVdFdhGAGgx6nUYZUi2MBAQWHbwKBNwc/DQEBAQEBAQEBEAEBAQEHCwsJHzCCHYIHAQEDARIRHQEbHgMBCwYFCw8CJgICIgERAQUBHAYbGod2AQMKCKkqgTA+MYtBgWyCeYlhChknDVaEFgEBCAIBGQEFDoEUhVGEe4RZOoJpgUMFjWyHaox6mSwSI4EXgimCHR4ziEkBAQE X-IPAS-Result: A0AvDQBxwfBVlLDWVdFdhGAGgx6nUYZUi2MBAQWHbwKBNwc/DQEBAQEBAQEBEAEBAQEHCwsJHzCCHYIHAQEDARIRHQEbHgMBCwYFCw8CJgICIgERAQUBHAYbGod2AQMKCKkqgTA+MYtBgWyCeYlhChknDVaEFgEBCAIBGQEFDoEUhVGEe4RZOoJpgUMFjWyHaox6mSwSI4EXgimCHR4ziEkBAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,500,1437429600"; d="scan'208";a="145287612" Received: from mail-ob0-f176.google.com ([209.85.214.176]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-GCM-SHA256; 10 Sep 2015 01:36:44 +0200 Received: by obbda8 with SMTP id da8so21315212obb.1 for ; Wed, 09 Sep 2015 16:36:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vRtks9DOZUoKJhestZuqu4SXNBjGIdO8EBdqsS20JaY=; b=L3+/pPpuhPUOjVqLGIqkcGWRiby+5CZ1MDZViJ46Cy3+9Uta+tKPR76q992JVjmtCi PXasdiUZYztrOKdjMluFLn2h0GtRpGKEAeveMy9aoaMm9+S3c0FxI/gg31W1JqpOxM5W cVStboqBZqZRIKBADowlW6eAxmFvJWWyKuI5Y6KxiHvoAE/exf0BUb0ZdKtmewbasLY+ ekrOrlrMjXGDsIkjtbRVza9/NwFDSxuVW6JwzNF295DVpkC3Xu8HE21Nq2+zQlUA7eEb jVQ5rMa5H2vAAPYOd70Lcx8oL1gde32iaegZqg35jDmDSZm14BBFGyFew1m6d0L23qsd jL2A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.75.225 with SMTP id f1mr5544081obw.50.1441841803218; Wed, 09 Sep 2015 16:36:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.172.36 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 16:36:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <279F86C517F5492E94C9880187EA0333@erratique.ch> References: <55F09806.1030507@nmt.edu> <20150909205548.GA12106@pema> <55F0B2CA.40707@nmt.edu> <279F86C517F5492E94C9880187EA0333@erratique.ch> Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 16:36:43 -0700 Message-ID: From: Raoul Duke To: OCaml Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Use of unit testing frameworks in OCaml > The problem (beyond Gabriel's more sensitive answer) with these all these= testing framework is that they seem to be too busy to uncreatively copy th= e useless crap oo testing framework and terminology rather than provide act= ual useful tools for programmers. hell yes. amen. always made/makes me mad, myself. testify! +1! i'd vote for you. wish i had a successful company so i could try to hire you away. w00t. thank got i'm not the only crazy one. are you married?