From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A68D67F7AF for ; Sun, 27 Sep 2015 01:29:02 +0200 (CEST) IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:HChGfhSuLON60gmfVOPDYJhbRdpsv+yvbD5Q0YIujvd0So/mwa64YBWN2/xhgRfzUJnB7Loc0qyN4/ymBDZLuMjY+Fk5M7VyFDY9wf0MmAIhBMPXQWbaF9XNKxIAIcJZSVV+9Gu6O0UGUOz3ZlnVv2HgpWVKQka3CwN5K6zPF5LIiIzvjqbpq8GVPl8D3WTkKZpJbzyI7izp/vEMhoVjLqtjgjDomVBvP9ps+GVzOFiIlAz97MrjtLRq8iBXpu5zv5UYCfayLOwESul/Jz0jNyhh78TusVzHTBCTznoaSGQf1BRSVVvr9hb/C634tTb+/sZg2yTSadf/Sq0wVRyt6q5qTFnjjyJRZG1xy33elsEl1PETmxmmvREqm4M= Authentication-Results: mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; spf=None smtp.pra=raould@gmail.com; spf=Pass smtp.mailfrom=raould@gmail.com; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster@mail-ob0-f177.google.com Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of raould@gmail.com) identity=pra; client-ip=209.85.214.177; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="raould@gmail.com"; x-sender="raould@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of raould@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.177 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.214.177; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="raould@gmail.com"; x-sender="raould@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail-ob0-f177.google.com) identity=helo; client-ip=209.85.214.177; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="raould@gmail.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mail-ob0-f177.google.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BTAwCFKQdWm7HWVdFdg3hpBrFFjXiFdgECAoEaBzwQAQEBAQEBAQEQAQEBAQEGCwsJIS5BA4FZgggBAQMBEhEdARseAwELBgULDwImAgIiAREBBQEcBjWHdgEDCggNqUGBMD4xi0eBbIJ5iVYKGScNVoQ2AQEBBwEBAQEYAQEEDoEUhVGEfYUUgmmBQwWNdId8hRWHeplzEiOBFziCL4IdHjOHPYFkAQEB X-IPAS-Result: A0BTAwCFKQdWm7HWVdFdg3hpBrFFjXiFdgECAoEaBzwQAQEBAQEBAQEQAQEBAQEGCwsJIS5BA4FZgggBAQMBEhEdARseAwELBgULDwImAgIiAREBBQEcBjWHdgEDCggNqUGBMD4xi0eBbIJ5iVYKGScNVoQ2AQEBBwEBAQEYAQEEDoEUhVGEfYUUgmmBQwWNdId8hRWHeplzEiOBFziCL4IdHjOHPYFkAQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,594,1437429600"; d="scan'208";a="148687205" Received: from mail-ob0-f177.google.com ([209.85.214.177]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-GCM-SHA256; 27 Sep 2015 01:29:01 +0200 Received: by obbda8 with SMTP id da8so105433777obb.1 for ; Sat, 26 Sep 2015 16:29:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=SOwU82vYnGx64PvLiMF9LoLKcpU834RX59P5P/qoyNg=; b=EprDrWjum00QBKMBS8kxlqk6B/vNpzeqZTfoZLZA0WhkqBOw+j4y8b9FxsSg4qYMN3 OfRWwUUZuXaKFdYvOGdUoHJw7vjwvbH/TCKztzK9cmUKpumKsHWX8IvUcFKNjhgbImlt qVOcbydCfDL6BVAeAcWiLL/ERL8bulmaL6LH0NcK5OfpS1mN4KAmGz/Qg7MmhEESI3KL zymY2zuueWMJBCpTHwaerFWVvCgHs17QNmxhhnWS4z/pfIVCnFCUwByzNFRMwIYPbjne Z290GpP5Ak+qblDXPz3qfALFresBIjJBbMg8FZQiMO2/+XtbDx7D/z19oKrAKKiH/p15 60kA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.213.68 with SMTP id nq4mr6727840obc.16.1443310140308; Sat, 26 Sep 2015 16:29:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.172.36 with HTTP; Sat, 26 Sep 2015 16:29:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1443259698.4442.12.camel@e130.lan.sumadev.de> Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2015 16:29:00 -0700 Message-ID: From: Raoul Duke To: OCaml Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] whither portability? > No one is being parochial or "actively" ignoring mobile. The OCaml core > team consists of unpaid volunteers. I suggest that next time, in place > of a snide remark, you contribute some code and/or money. i would contribute money. not much, but some. i'm not super rich. :-) but, no idea where one could do that. doubt most people would have known even if it were possible. googlign returns bad broken history about this e.g. https://github.com/ocaml/opam/issues/326