From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 357127EE44 for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 15:43:35 +0100 (CET) Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of lukstafi@gmail.com) identity=pra; client-ip=209.85.212.175; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="lukstafi@gmail.com"; x-sender="lukstafi@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of lukstafi@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.175 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.212.175; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="lukstafi@gmail.com"; x-sender="lukstafi@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail-wi0-f175.google.com) identity=helo; client-ip=209.85.212.175; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="lukstafi@gmail.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mail-wi0-f175.google.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjMFAE4mbVLRVdSvlGdsb2JhbABZgkUBeVSMPplMmFWBFAgWDgEBAQEHCwsJEiMHgiYBBUABGx4DDAYFAQEBAQIFOyIBEQEFARwGiAcBAw8NmUaMVoMKg3UKGScNZIkBAQEEDI9QhCwDmAqQGxgphFI7 X-IPAS-Result: AjMFAE4mbVLRVdSvlGdsb2JhbABZgkUBeVSMPplMmFWBFAgWDgEBAQEHCwsJEiMHgiYBBUABGx4DDAYFAQEBAQIFOyIBEQEFARwGiAcBAw8NmUaMVoMKg3UKGScNZIkBAQEEDI9QhCwDmAqQGxgphFI7 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,580,1378850400"; d="scan'208";a="32084466" Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com ([209.85.212.175]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 27 Oct 2013 15:43:34 +0100 Received: by mail-wi0-f175.google.com with SMTP id hm4so2839793wib.8 for ; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 07:43:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=CZh+UnoRmROV27IfmyWil6viGqNnQpSZaZqUPu6A8DQ=; b=QmwkdJ7I+jxo0GPvTJwOj9S6R2iE/1KwO0rl1B6u/McfRfd+u9j/FUEsdzW7YORRqz DqqWRhXlQ3LOrP78H89Fvn1jGxnJlsmC4994opLhBkq0ftHRAJCvllmSx1ymE/lRhQN+ irZhlhTxLNOwWsq5vtAZBCmkJiDGMzudd88MQ0bo0lPVb0kySnNW38DqFSwly7dzqWVx t+VhgykJ9Qm2okdHxlVqd3UL3hjjotnNvupynB/r/LNdeWNCPGVv89Mw5McZ7p4/L6VR 2v6+Aqq4Fkd9d4+G3oaZPuPqjO8pnBwuOU4rIlQFpz4c2WoLDc8bvTT/RSc3FleaN0yQ u4qw== X-Received: by 10.181.13.173 with SMTP id ez13mr5574630wid.49.1382885014332; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 07:43:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.181.4 with HTTP; Sun, 27 Oct 2013 07:43:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Lukasz Stafiniak Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 15:43:14 +0100 Message-ID: To: "caml-list@inria.fr" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0438eddf0b6e5d04e9ba0292 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Should -strict-sequence become the default? --f46d0438eddf0b6e5d04e9ba0292 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I am very much in favor of restrictive defaults. I tend to not change compiler settings if I am not forced to... --f46d0438eddf0b6e5d04e9ba0292 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
I am very much in favor of restrictive defaults. I tend to not change compiler settings if I am not forced to...
--f46d0438eddf0b6e5d04e9ba0292--