From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <lukstafi@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6AFA7ED45
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 01:07:08 +0200 (CEST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AggCAPqc509KfVK2kGdsb2JhbABEtXQIIgEBAQEJCQ0HFAQjghgBAQEEEgIsARsdAQMMBgULDS4hAQERAQUBHAYTCBqHWgEDC5o7CQOMI4JxhAIKGScNV4hxAQUMikRjhgIDlS6JJoFcgyI+hAA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,468,1336341600"; 
   d="scan'208";a="164233199"
Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com ([74.125.82.182])
  by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 25 Jun 2012 01:07:08 +0200
Received: by werg1 with SMTP id g1so3727441wer.27
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 16:07:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :cc:content-type;
        bh=VJlm36r+Pu2PSSCfRXuZaOMx/9XvZKGL5wMdX1Qd5y0=;
        b=YRt3GIPe3nMQpUT3fmul4zLIcIuey5GtMKtGEbpV/qoLPUnRpCV4GFlBIeTqCB7mVt
         mqlVHMHkuHAndgZtW+YjtWakDba6uicPEqp4HiMG+8fRdTkD8QS7dJ9bjq4WKSsOxFzG
         HQ42T2Tq0AsjJNErhB5yM7ZX4tXOyNQvk4+vRLC4pxh4GLpTkH7FVYdiUTq8fPGQ8+Pq
         1XmWlL/uJ7AFDF9bJpoQAB3nxdPp6FO5FqJcs6t+edM/rv2FUvLn3j51wtVsLFT5YE97
         QNPi3eANOaUIkXZPysxMNdBq4SaOKoUA6PvMiQpw02e13bPNa2e12gmi6dAId8wbj0E2
         ixCA==
Received: by 10.216.140.33 with SMTP id d33mr5225337wej.113.1340579228039;
 Sun, 24 Jun 2012 16:07:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.180.93.197 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 16:06:47 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAHqiZ-Lmhyn1tXihc-5hmjdy7Bgqo3nq_ifdBsoidYO-80SPfQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHqiZ-KRTmTC4196dikqj8B5t4F84xEJTONaX4+Ns2UhjgeJtQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20120624211840.124466j26yxz6rkg@webmail.in-berlin.de> <CAHqiZ-JOw4n1bZO_WiS5qpyHLHfK3epz0WuL2nnB36B61y=4cA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20120624.220220.2022399462583597382.Christophe.Troestler@umons.ac.be> <CAHqiZ-Lmhyn1tXihc-5hmjdy7Bgqo3nq_ifdBsoidYO-80SPfQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lukasz Stafiniak <lukstafi@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 01:06:47 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJMfKEWeOWTKgFvB4KDyzXaGs94L9ppcvA7WQqyDSdBEOQ0bVA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Diego Olivier Fernandez Pons <dofp.ocaml@gmail.com>
Cc: OCaml Mailing List <caml-list@inria.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] print_int is too slow

On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 12:19 AM, Diego Olivier Fernandez Pons
<dofp.ocaml@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> During all the years I have been coding, I had never had to worry
> about flushing I/O (when / why / how) in any language (C/C++, Java, C#
> and OCaml).
> I actually had even forgotten those things existed...

You haven't needed to flush output when debugging?